Utilizing Free Clients in Federated Learning for Focused Model Enhancement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning approach to learn models on decentralized heterogeneous data, without the need for clients to share their data. Many existing FL approaches assume that all clients have equal importance and construct a global objective based on all clients. We consider a version of FL we call Prioritized FL, where the goal is to learn a weighted mean objective of a subset of clients, designated as priority clients. An important question arises: How do we choose and incentivize well aligned non priority clients to participate in the federation, while discarding misaligned clients? We present FedALIGN (Federated Adaptive Learning with Inclusion of Global Needs) to address this challenge. The algorithm employs a matching strategy that chooses non priority clients based on how similar the models loss is on their data compared to the global data, thereby ensuring the use of non priority client gradients only when it is beneficial for priority clients. This approach ensures mutual benefits as non priority clients are motivated to join when the model performs satisfactorily on their data, and priority clients can utilize their updates and computational resources when their goals align. We present a convergence analysis that quantifies the trade off between client selection and speed of convergence. Our algorithm shows faster convergence and higher test accuracy than baselines for various synthetic and benchmark datasets.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2023.
Builds on
26 of 34 references.
References · 26
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,220
- 2020Adaptive Federated Optimizationcited by 1,036
- 2020Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated Optimizationcited by 897
- 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 669
- 2018Local SGD Converges Fast and Communicates Littlecited by 595
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 565
- 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
- 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 462
14 more
- 2020A Unified Theory of Decentralized SGD with Changing Topology and Local Updatescited by 361
- 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 347
- 2020Client Selection in Federated Learning: Convergence Analysis and Power-of-Choice Selection Strategiescited by 196
- 2020Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?cited by 151
- 2019On the Convergence of Local Descent Methods in Federated Learningcited by 150
- 2020FedPD: A Federated Learning Framework with Optimal Rates and Adaptivity to Non-IID Datacited by 143
- 2020Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learningcited by 123
- 2020FedSplit: An algorithmic framework for fast federated optimizationcited by 108
- 2020TiFL: A Tier-based Federated Learning Systemcited by 95
- 2022Client Selection in Federated Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 62
- 2020Fast-Convergent Federated Learningcited by 61
- 2020Federated learning with class imbalance reductioncited by 52
- 2021Linear Speedup in Personalized Collaborative Learningcited by 8
- 2021Federated Asymptotics: a model to compare federated learning algorithmscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.