mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Epipolar Constraint Meets Non-local Operators in Multi-View Stereo

arXiv 2309.17218 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning-based multi-view stereo (MVS) method heavily relies on feature matching, which requires distinctive and descriptive representations. An effective solution is to apply non-local feature aggregation, e.g., Transformer. Albeit useful, these techniques introduce heavy computation overheads for MVS. Each pixel densely attends to the whole image. In contrast, we propose to constrain non-local feature augmentation within a pair of lines: each point only attends the corresponding pair of epipolar lines. Our idea takes inspiration from the classic epipolar geometry, which shows that one point with different depth hypotheses will be projected to the epipolar line on the other view. This constraint reduces the 2D search space into the epipolar line in stereo matching. Similarly, this suggests that the matching of MVS is to distinguish a series of points lying on the same line. Inspired by this point-to-line search, we devise a line-to-point non-local augmentation strategy. We first devise an optimized searching algorithm to split the 2D feature maps into epipolar line pairs. Then, an Epipolar Transformer (ET) performs non-local feature augmentation among epipolar line pairs. We incorporate the ET into a learning-based MVS baseline, named ET-MVSNet. ET-MVSNet achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction performance on both the DTU and Tanks-and-Temples benchmark with high efficiency. Code is available at https://github.com/TQTQliu/ET-MVSNet.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2023.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  3. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  4. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  5. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 1,979
  6. 2017Deformable Convolutional Networkscited by 1,481
  7. 2018MVSNet: Depth Inference for Unstructured Multi-view Stereocited by 780
  8. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
  9. 2021CSWin Transformer: A General Vision Transformer Backbone with Cross-Shaped Windowscited by 526
  10. 2019BlendedMVS: A Large-scale Dataset for Generalized Multi-view Stereo Networkscited by 487
  11. 2019Cascade Cost Volume for High-Resolution Multi-View Stereo and Stereo Matchingcited by 414
  12. 2019Recurrent MVSNet for High-resolution Multi-view Stereo Depth Inferencecited by 252
11 more
  1. 2019Cost Volume Pyramid Based Depth Inference for Multi-View Stereocited by 154
  2. 2019Deep Stereo using Adaptive Thin Volume Representation with Uncertainty Awarenesscited by 151
  3. 2019Point-Based Multi-View Stereo Networkcited by 147
  4. 2017SurfaceNet: An End-to-end 3D Neural Network for Multiview Stereopsiscited by 128
  5. 2021TransMVSNet: Global Context-aware Multi-view Stereo Network with Transformerscited by 117
  6. 2022Rethinking Depth Estimation for Multi-View Stereo: A Unified Representationcited by 82
  7. 2020Dense Hybrid Recurrent Multi-view Stereo Net with Dynamic Consistency Checkingcited by 81
  8. 2021AA-RMVSNet: Adaptive Aggregation Recurrent Multi-view Stereo Networkcited by 71
  9. 2022MVSTER: Epipolar Transformer for Efficient Multi-View Stereocited by 50
  10. 2019Pyramid Multi-view Stereo Net with Self-adaptive View Aggregationcited by 44
  11. 2021Generalized Binary Search Network for Highly-Efficient Multi-View Stereocited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 8; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: