Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks perform exceedingly well across various machine learning tasks but are not immune to adversarial perturbations. This vulnerability has implications for real-world applications. While much research has been conducted, the underlying reasons why neural networks fall prey to adversarial attacks are not yet fully understood. Central to our study, which explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets, is the identification of human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Additionally, we uncover two distinct effects manifesting within human-identifiable features. Specifically, the masking effect is prominent in untargeted attacks, while the generation effect is more common in targeted attacks. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models. In addition, our findings indicate a notable extent of similarity in perturbations across different attack algorithms when averaged over multiple models. This work also provides insights into phenomena associated with adversarial perturbations, such as transferability and model interpretability. Our study contributes to a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind adversarial attacks and offers insights for the development of more resilient defense strategies for neural networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.
Builds on
27 of 39 references.
References · 27
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,321
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,707
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,457
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,137
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,992
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,767
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,316
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,103
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
15 more
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 878
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 684
- 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 581
- 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 536
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 516
- 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 444
- 2018Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Datacited by 318
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 157
- 2020Torchattacks: A PyTorch Repository for Adversarial Attackscited by 157
- 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
- 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 99
- 2018Adversarial Examples that Fool both Computer Vision and Time-Limited Humanscited by 73
- 2016A Boundary Tilting Persepective on the Phenomenon of Adversarial Examplescited by 70
- 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 50
Built on by
Not cited yet.