Calibration-based Dual Prototypical Contrastive Learning Approach for Domain Generalization Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prototypical contrastive learning (PCL) has been widely used to learn class-wise domain-invariant features recently. These methods are based on the assumption that the prototypes, which are represented as the central value of the same class in a certain domain, are domain-invariant. Since the prototypes of different domains have discrepancies as well, the class-wise domain-invariant features learned from the source domain by PCL need to be aligned with the prototypes of other domains simultaneously. However, the prototypes of the same class in different domains may be different while the prototypes of different classes may be similar, which may affect the learning of class-wise domain-invariant features. Based on these observations, a calibration-based dual prototypical contrastive learning (CDPCL) approach is proposed to reduce the domain discrepancy between the learned class-wise features and the prototypes of different domains for domain generalization semantic segmentation. It contains an uncertainty-guided PCL (UPCL) and a hard-weighted PCL (HPCL). Since the domain discrepancies of the prototypes of different classes may be different, we propose an uncertainty probability matrix to represent the domain discrepancies of the prototypes of all the classes. The UPCL estimates the uncertainty probability matrix to calibrate the weights of the prototypes during the PCL. Moreover, considering that the prototypes of different classes may be similar in some circumstances, which means these prototypes are hard-aligned, the HPCL is proposed to generate a hard-weighted matrix to calibrate the weights of the hard-aligned prototypes during the PCL. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance over current approaches on domain generalization semantic segmentation tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.
Builds on
35 of 59 references.
References · 35
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
- 2018BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learningcited by 1,288
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
- 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 818
- 2017Learning to Generalize: Meta-Learning for Domain Generalizationcited by 763
- 2018Two at Once: Enhancing Learning and Generalization Capacities via IBN-Netcited by 364
- 2019Domain Randomization and Pyramid Consistency: Simulation-to-Real Generalization without Accessing Target Domain Datacited by 246
- 2021RobustNet: Improving Domain Generalization in Urban-Scene Segmentation via Instance Selective Whiteningcited by 215
23 more
- 2018Progressive Feature Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 183
- 2021FSDR: Frequency Space Domain Randomization for Domain Generalizationcited by 164
- 2018IDD: A Dataset for Exploring Problems of Autonomous Navigation in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 163
- 2019Switchable Whitening for Deep Representation Learningcited by 106
- 2022Style-Hallucinated Dual Consistency Learning for Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentationcited by 89
- 2022Semantic-Aware Domain Generalized Segmentationcited by 79
- 2022WildNet: Learning Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentation from the Wildcited by 76
- 2021Global and Local Texture Randomization for Synthetic-to-Real Semantic Segmentationcited by 57
- 2022Pin the Memory: Learning to Generalize Semantic Segmentationcited by 49
- 2021Style Normalization and Restitution for Domain Generalization and Adaptationcited by 46
- 2021Uncertainty-guided Model Generalization to Unseen Domainscited by 41
- 2022Compound Domain Generalization via Meta-Knowledge Encodingcited by 40
- 2022Prototypical Contrast Adaptation for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 40
- 2022MTTrans: Cross-Domain Object Detection with Mean-Teacher Transformercited by 35
- 2021Feature-based Style Randomization for Domain Generalizationcited by 34
- 2021A Bit More Bayesian: Domain-Invariant Learning with Uncertaintycited by 27
- 2022Domain Generalization via Frequency-domain-based Feature Disentanglement and Interactioncited by 21
- 2020Generalizable Model-agnostic Semantic Segmentation via Target-specific Normalizationcited by 20
- 2021Out-of-Domain Generalization from a Single Source: An Uncertainty Quantification Approachcited by 18
- 2022Bi-directional Contrastive Learning for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 14
- 2022Bidirectional Self-Training with Multiple Anisotropic Prototypes for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 10
- 2021Adversarial Semantic Hallucination for Domain Generalized Semantic Segmentationcited by 9
- 2022BP-Triplet Net for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Bayesian Perspectivecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.