AI Risk Profiles: A Standards Proposal for Pre-Deployment AI Risk Disclosures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI systems' sophistication and proliferation have increased, awareness of the risks has grown proportionally (Sorkin et al. 2023). In response, calls have grown for stronger emphasis on disclosure and transparency in the AI industry (NTIA 2023; OpenAI 2023b), with proposals ranging from standardizing use of technical disclosures, like model cards (Mitchell et al. 2019), to yet-unspecified licensing regimes (Sindhu 2023). Since the AI value chain is complicated, with actors representing various expertise, perspectives, and values, it is crucial that consumers of a transparency disclosure be able to understand the risks of the AI system the disclosure concerns. In this paper we propose a risk profiling standard which can guide downstream decision-making, including triaging further risk assessment, informing procurement and deployment, and directing regulatory frameworks. The standard is built on our proposed taxonomy of AI risks, which reflects a high-level categorization of the wide variety of risks proposed in the literature. We outline the myriad data sources needed to construct informative Risk Profiles and propose a template-based methodology for collating risk information into a standard, yet flexible, structure. We apply this methodology to a number of prominent AI systems using publicly available information. To conclude, we discuss design decisions for the profiles and future work.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.
Builds on
12 of 27 references.
References · 12
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 177
- 2023GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Modelscited by 176
- 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
- 2023Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Societycited by 92
- 2023On the Creativity of Large Language Modelscited by 57
- 2022A taxonomic system for failure cause analysis of open source AI incidentscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Co-designing an AI Impact Assessment Report Template with AI Practitioners and AI Compliance Expertscited by 10
- 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reportscited by 10
- 2025The Unified Control Framework: Establishing a Common Foundation for Enterprise AI Governance, Risk Management and Regulatory Compliancecited by 4
- 2026When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizationscited by 1
- 2026When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations17 Jul 2026
- 2025STREAM (ChemBio): A Standard for Transparently Reporting Evaluations in AI Model Reports13 Aug 2025
- 2025The Unified Control Framework: Establishing a Common Foundation for Enterprise AI Governance, Risk Management and Regulatory Compliance7 Mar 2025
- 2024Co-designing an AI Impact Assessment Report Template with AI Practitioners and AI Compliance Experts24 Jul 2024