Controlled Generation with Prompt Insertion for Natural Language Explanations in Grammatical Error Correction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Grammatical Error Correction (GEC), it is crucial to ensure the user's comprehension of a reason for correction. Existing studies present tokens, examples, and hints as to the basis for correction but do not directly explain the reasons for corrections. Although methods that use Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide direct explanations in natural language have been proposed for various tasks, no such method exists for GEC. Generating explanations for GEC corrections involves aligning input and output tokens, identifying correction points, and presenting corresponding explanations consistently. However, it is not straightforward to specify a complex format to generate explanations, because explicit control of generation is difficult with prompts. This study introduces a method called controlled generation with Prompt Insertion (PI) so that LLMs can explain the reasons for corrections in natural language. In PI, LLMs first correct the input text, and then we automatically extract the correction points based on the rules. The extracted correction points are sequentially inserted into the LLM's explanation output as prompts, guiding the LLMs to generate explanations for the correction points. We also create an Explainable GEC (XGEC) dataset of correction reasons by annotating NUCLE, CoNLL2013, and CoNLL2014. Although generations from GPT-3 and ChatGPT using original prompts miss some correction points, the generation control using PI can explicitly guide to describe explanations for all correction points, contributing to improved performance in generating correction reasons.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2023.
Builds on
20 of 42 references.
References · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2020GECToR -- Grammatical Error Correction: Tag, Not Rewritecited by 177
- 2021Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanationscited by 125
- 2022Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Bettercited by 123
- 2019Encode, Tag, Realize: High-Precision Text Editingcited by 99
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
- 2023Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language Explanationscited by 85
- 2022Gender Bias in Masked Language Models for Multiple Languagescited by 60
- 2020Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 59
- 2023Exploring Effectiveness of GPT-3 in Grammatical Error Correction: A Study on Performance and Controllability in Prompt-Based Methodscited by 37
8 more
- 2020Improving the Efficiency of Grammatical Error Correction with Erroneous Span Detection and Correctioncited by 24
- 2023Enhancing Grammatical Error Correction Systems with Explanationscited by 19
- 2023Evaluating Gender Bias of Pre-trained Language Models in Natural Language Inference by Considering All Labelscited by 16
- 2022Interpretability for Language Learners Using Example-Based Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 13
- 2019Controllable Data Synthesis Method for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 8
- 2023Comparing Intrinsic Gender Bias Evaluation Measures without using Human Annotated Examplescited by 8
- 2023Solving NLP Problems through Human-System Collaboration: A Discussion-based Approachcited by 5
- 2021Diversity-Driven Combination for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 49
- 2024Rethinking the Roles of Large Language Models in Chinese Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 9
- 2025Imitating Mistakes in a Learning Companion AI Agent for Online Peer Learningcited by 3
- 2025Scaling and Prompting for Improved End-to-End Spoken Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 2
- 2025Annotating Errors in English Learners' Written Language Production: Advancing Automated Written Feedback Systemscited by 2
- 2024Tibyan Corpus: Balanced and Comprehensive Error Coverage Corpus Using ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 1
- 2025RE2: Improving Chinese Grammatical Error Correction via Retrieving Appropriate Examples with Explanationcited by 0
- 2025RE2: Improving Chinese Grammatical Error Correction via Retrieving Appropriate Examples with Explanation30 Sep 2025
- 2025Annotating Errors in English Learners' Written Language Production: Advancing Automated Written Feedback Systems9 Aug 2025
- 2025Imitating Mistakes in a Learning Companion AI Agent for Online Peer Learning17 Jul 2025
- 2025Scaling and Prompting for Improved End-to-End Spoken Grammatical Error Correction27 May 2025
- 2024Tibyan Corpus: Balanced and Comprehensive Error Coverage Corpus Using ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correction7 Nov 2024
- 2024Rethinking the Roles of Large Language Models in Chinese Grammatical Error Correction18 Feb 2024
- 2024Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models via Chain-of-Thought Prompting28 Jan 2024