Tibyan Corpus: Balanced and Comprehensive Error Coverage Corpus Using ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Natural language processing (NLP) utilizes text data augmentation to overcome sample size constraints. Increasing the sample size is a natural and widely used strategy for alleviating these challenges. In this study, we chose Arabic to increase the sample size and correct grammatical errors. Arabic is considered one of the languages with limited resources for grammatical error correction (GEC). Furthermore, QALB-14 and QALB-15 are the only datasets used in most Arabic grammatical error correction research, with approximately 20,500 parallel examples, which is considered low compared with other languages. Therefore, this study aims to develop an Arabic corpus called "Tibyan" for grammatical error correction using ChatGPT. ChatGPT is used as a data augmenter tool based on a pair of Arabic sentences containing grammatical errors matched with a sentence free of errors extracted from Arabic books, called guide sentences. Multiple steps were involved in establishing our corpus, including the collection and pre-processing of a pair of Arabic texts from various sources, such as books and open-access corpora. We then used ChatGPT to generate a parallel corpus based on the text collected previously, as a guide for generating sentences with multiple types of errors. By engaging linguistic experts to review and validate the automatically generated sentences, we ensured that they were correct and error-free. The corpus was validated and refined iteratively based on feedback provided by linguistic experts to improve its accuracy. Finally, we used the Arabic Error Type Annotation tool (ARETA) to analyze the types of errors in the Tibyan corpus. Our corpus contained 49 of errors, including seven types: orthography, morphology, syntax, semantics, punctuation, merge, and split. The Tibyan corpus contains approximately 600 K tokens.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.
Builds on
12 of 31 references.
References · 12
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 97
- 2023ChatGPT or Grammarly? Evaluating ChatGPT on Grammatical Error Correction Benchmarkcited by 77
- 2020Seq2Edits: Sequence Transduction Using Span-level Edit Operationscited by 58
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Artcited by 43
- 2023Exploring Effectiveness of GPT-3 in Grammatical Error Correction: A Study on Performance and Controllability in Prompt-Based Methodscited by 37
- 2023GrammarGPT: Exploring Open-Source LLMs for Native Chinese Grammatical Error Correction with Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 23
- 2021Automatic Error Type Annotation for Arabiccited by 21
- 2023Controlled Generation with Prompt Insertion for Natural Language Explanations in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 7
- 2023RobustGEC: Robust Grammatical Error Correction Against Subtle Context Perturbationcited by 6
- 2023ChatGPT for Arabic Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.