Platonic Representations in the Human Brain: Unsupervised Recovery of Universal Geometry
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The Strong Platonic Representation Hypothesis suggests that representational convergence in artificial neural networks can be harnessed constructively: embeddings can be translated across models through a universal latent space without paired data. We ask whether an analogous geometry can be recovered across human brains. Using fMRI data from the Natural Scenes Dataset, we propose a self-supervised encoder that learns subject-specific embeddings from brain data alone by exploiting repeated stimulus presentations. We show that these independently learned spaces can be translated across subjects using unsupervised orthogonal rotations, without paired cross-subject samples or intermediate model representations. Synchronizing pairwise rotations into a single shared latent space further improves cross-subject retrieval, indicating that subject-specific spaces are mutually compatible with a common coordinate system. These results provide evidence for a shared neural geometry in the human visual cortex: subject-specific fMRI representations are approximately isometric across individuals and can be translated through purely geometric transformations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 60 references.
References · 26
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 362
- 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
- 2021Revisiting Model Stitching to Compare Neural Representationscited by 203
14 more
- 2022Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationcited by 175
- 2016On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning: Objectives and Optimizationcited by 162
- 2023Reconstructing the Mind's Eye: fMRI-to-Image with Contrastive Learning and Diffusion Priorscited by 156
- 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 142
- 2018Gromov-Wasserstein Alignment of Word Embedding Spacescited by 119
- 2023Natural scene reconstruction from fMRI signals using generative latent diffusioncited by 97
- 2018Unsupervised Alignment of Embeddings with Wasserstein Procrustescited by 96
- 2025Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddingscited by 54
- 2023The Topology and Geometry of Neural Representationscited by 13
- 2024CLIP-MUSED: CLIP-Guided Multi-Subject Visual Neural Information Semantic Decodingcited by 13
- 2024Universal dimensions of visual representationcited by 12
- 2025Representation Potentials of Foundation Models for Multimodal Alignment: A Surveycited by 10
- 2025mini-vec2vec: Scaling Universal Geometry Alignment with Linear Transformationscited by 3
- 2025Shared representations in brains and models reveal a two-route cortical organization during scene perceptioncited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.