mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hardening RGB-D Object Recognition Systems against Adversarial Patch Attacks

arXiv 2309.07106 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

RGB-D object recognition systems improve their predictive performances by fusing color and depth information, outperforming neural network architectures that rely solely on colors. While RGB-D systems are expected to be more robust to adversarial examples than RGB-only systems, they have also been proven to be highly vulnerable. Their robustness is similar even when the adversarial examples are generated by altering only the original images' colors. Different works highlighted the vulnerability of RGB-D systems; however, there is a lacking of technical explanations for this weakness. Hence, in our work, we bridge this gap by investigating the learned deep representation of RGB-D systems, discovering that color features make the function learned by the network more complex and, thus, more sensitive to small perturbations. To mitigate this problem, we propose a defense based on a detection mechanism that makes RGB-D systems more robust against adversarial examples. We empirically show that this defense improves the performances of RGB-D systems against adversarial examples even when they are computed ad-hoc to circumvent this detection mechanism, and that is also more effective than adversarial training.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.

Builds on

27 of 34 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  4. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  6. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 689
  7. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 517
  8. 2017Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 414
  9. 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 269
  10. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
  11. 2018LaVAN: Localized and Visible Adversarial Noisecited by 113
  12. 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 94
15 more
  1. 2019EasyLabel: A Semi-Automatic Pixel-wise Object Annotation Tool for Creating Robotic RGB-D Datasetscited by 58
  2. 2015Multimodal Deep Learning for Robust RGB-D Object Recognitioncited by 57
  3. 2021Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Drivingcited by 45
  4. 2019Deep Neural Rejection against Adversarial Examplescited by 32
  5. 2022Machine Learning Security against Data Poisoning: Are We There Yet?cited by 23
  6. 2017Is Deep Learning Safe for Robot Vision? Adversarial Examples against the iCub Humanoidcited by 19
  7. 2020A black-box adversarial attack for poisoning clusteringcited by 16
  8. 2021Adversarial Attacks on Camera-LiDAR Models for 3D Car Detectioncited by 16
  9. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Camera-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 15
  10. 2020Investigating Vulnerability to Adversarial Examples on Multimodal Data Fusion in Deep Learningcited by 11
  11. 2020FADER: Fast Adversarial Example Rejectioncited by 9
  12. 2021The Hammer and the Nut: Is Bilevel Optimization Really Needed to Poison Linear Classifiers?cited by 9
  13. 2018Recurrent Convolutional Fusion for RGB-D Object Recognitioncited by 7
  14. 2020Adversarial Robustness of Deep Sensor Fusion Modelscited by 6
  15. 2018Multimodal Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.