Investigating the Impact of Action Representations in Policy Gradient Algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reinforcement learning~(RL) is a versatile framework for learning to solve complex real-world tasks. However, influences on the learning performance of RL algorithms are often poorly understood in practice. We discuss different analysis techniques and assess their effectiveness for investigating the impact of action representations in RL. Our experiments demonstrate that the action representation can significantly influence the learning performance on popular RL benchmark tasks. The analysis results indicate that some of the performance differences can be attributed to changes in the complexity of the optimization landscape. Finally, we discuss open challenges of analysis techniques for RL algorithms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.
Builds on
12 of 16 references.
References · 12
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
- 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 144
- 2016Learning Locomotion Skills Using DeepRL: Does the Choice of Action Space Matter?cited by 44
- 2020Learning to Locomote: Understanding How Environment Design Matters for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2019A Comparison of Action Spaces for Learning Manipulation Taskscited by 16
- 2019Learning Variable Impedance Control for Contact Sensitive Taskscited by 15
- 2022Cliff Diving: Exploring Reward Surfaces in Reinforcement Learning Environmentscited by 9
- 2020Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Actor Critic Methods with Applications in Inventory Optimizationcited by 5
- 2022Learning with Muscles: Benefits for Data-Efficiency and Robustness in Anthropomorphic Taskscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.