mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Visualizing Critic Match Loss Landscapes for Interpretation of Online Reinforcement Learning Control Algorithms

arXiv 2603.14535 ↗First posted 15 Mar 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has proven its power on various occasions. However, its performance is not always guaranteed when system dynamics change. Instead, it largely relies on users' empirical experience. For reinforcement learning algorithms with an actor-critic structure, the critic neural network reflects the approximation and optimization process in the RL algorithm. Analyzing the performance of the critic neural network helps to understand the mechanism of the algorithm. To support systematic interpretation of such algorithms in dynamic control problems, this work proposes a critic match loss landscape visualization method for online reinforcement learning. The method constructs a loss landscape by projecting recorded critic parameter trajectories onto a low-dimensional linear subspace. The critic match loss is evaluated over the projected parameter grid using fixed reference state samples and temporal-difference targets. This yields a three-dimensional loss surface together with a two-dimensional optimization path that characterizes critic learning behavior. To extend analysis beyond visual inspection, quantitative landscape indices and a normalized system performance index are introduced, enabling structured comparison across different training outcomes. The approach is demonstrated using the Action-Dependent Heuristic Dynamic Programming algorithm on cart-pole and spacecraft attitude control tasks. Comparative analyses across projection methods and training stages reveal distinct landscape characteristics associated with stable convergence and unstable learning. The proposed framework enables both qualitative and quantitative interpretation of critic optimization behavior in online reinforcement learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Mar 2026.

Builds on

9 of 22 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,126
  2. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
  3. 2016Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Controlcited by 361
  4. 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 201
  5. 2018Assessing Generalization in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 132
  6. 2023Policy Optimization in a Noisy Neighborhood: On Return Landscapes in Continuous Controlcited by 11
  7. 2022Cliff Diving: Exploring Reward Surfaces in Reinforcement Learning Environmentscited by 9
  8. 2020Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Actor Critic Methods with Applications in Inventory Optimizationcited by 5
  9. 2023Investigating the Impact of Action Representations in Policy Gradient Algorithmscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.