mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Text Encoders Lack Knowledge: Leveraging Generative LLMs for Domain-Specific Semantic Textual Similarity

arXiv 2309.06541 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Amidst the sharp rise in the evaluation of large language models (LLMs) on various tasks, we find that semantic textual similarity (STS) has been under-explored. In this study, we show that STS can be cast as a text generation problem while maintaining strong performance on multiple STS benchmarks. Additionally, we show generative LLMs significantly outperform existing encoder-based STS models when characterizing the semantic similarity between two texts with complex semantic relationships dependent on world knowledge. We validate this claim by evaluating both generative LLMs and existing encoder-based STS models on three newly collected STS challenge sets which require world knowledge in the domains of Health, Politics, and Sports. All newly collected data is sourced from social media content posted after May 2023 to ensure the performance of closed-source models like ChatGPT cannot be credited to memorization. Our results show that, on average, generative LLMs outperform the best encoder-only baselines by an average of 22.3% on STS tasks requiring world knowledge. Our results suggest generative language models with STS-specific prompting strategies achieve state-of-the-art performance in complex, domain-specific STS tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2023.

Builds on

15 of 31 references.

References · 15

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,322
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,979
  4. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,376
  5. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,107
  6. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,170
  7. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,600
  8. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,424
  9. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  10. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 957
  11. 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
  12. 2023Can ChatGPT Understand Too? A Comparative Study on ChatGPT and Fine-tuned BERTcited by 155
3 more
  1. 2023When do you need Chain-of-Thought Prompting for ChatGPT?cited by 34
  2. 2022Generate, Discriminate and Contrast: A Semi-Supervised Sentence Representation Learning Frameworkcited by 18
  3. 2022Predicting Human Similarity Judgments Using Large Language Modelscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

11 papers.