mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is the U.S. Legal System Ready for AI's Challenges to Human Values?

arXiv 2308.15906 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2023cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Our interdisciplinary study investigates how effectively U.S. laws confront the challenges posed by Generative AI to human values. Through an analysis of diverse hypothetical scenarios crafted during an expert workshop, we have identified notable gaps and uncertainties within the existing legal framework regarding the protection of fundamental values, such as privacy, autonomy, dignity, diversity, equity, and physical/mental well-being. Constitutional and civil rights, it appears, may not provide sufficient protection against AI-generated discriminatory outputs. Furthermore, even if we exclude the liability shield provided by Section 230, proving causation for defamation and product liability claims is a challenging endeavor due to the intricate and opaque nature of AI systems. To address the unique and unforeseeable threats posed by Generative AI, we advocate for legal frameworks that evolve to recognize new threats and provide proactive, auditable guidelines to industry stakeholders. Addressing these issues requires deep interdisciplinary collaborations to identify harms, values, and mitigation strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 174 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2023.

Builds on

30 of 174 references.

References · 30

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  3. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  4. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  6. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  7. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
  8. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 559
  9. 2019The Woman Worked as a Babysitter: On Biases in Language Generationcited by 540
  10. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 443
  11. 2023Towards Measuring the Representation of Subjective Global Opinions in Language Modelscited by 424
  12. 2021Towards Understanding and Mitigating Social Biases in Language Modelscited by 294
18 more
  1. 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 290
  2. 2020Detecting Emergent Intersectional Biases: Contextualized Word Embeddings Contain a Distribution of Human-like Biasescited by 167
  3. 2023Generative Language Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Mitigationscited by 157
  4. 2023Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' Viewscited by 145
  5. 2023Foundation Models and Fair Usecited by 112
  6. 2023Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Societycited by 91
  7. 2023When Large Language Models Meet Personalization: Perspectives of Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 89
  8. 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
  9. 2019A Just and Comprehensive Strategy for Using NLP to Address Online Abusecited by 49
  10. 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
  11. 2022CommunityLM: Probing Partisan Worldviews from Language Modelscited by 36
  12. 2023ChatGPT Perpetuates Gender Bias in Machine Translation and Ignores Non-Gendered Pronouns: Findings across Bengali and Five other Low-Resource Languagescited by 33
  13. 2021Copyright in Generative Deep Learningcited by 29
  14. 2023Decision-Oriented Dialogue for Human-AI Collaborationcited by 29
  15. 2023Evaluating Biased Attitude Associations of Language Models in an Intersectional Contextcited by 20
  16. 2021Putting words into the system's mouth: A targeted attack on neural machine translation using monolingual data poisoningcited by 19
  17. 2020ValNorm Quantifies Semantics to Reveal Consistent Valence Biases Across Languages and Over Centuriescited by 15
  18. 2022Why More Text is (Often) Better: Themes from Reader Preferences for Integration of Charts and Textcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.