Large Language Models on the Chessboard: A Study on ChatGPT's Formal Language Comprehension and Complex Reasoning Skills
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models have made strides in natural language processing, their proficiency in complex reasoning tasks requiring formal language comprehension, such as chess, remains less investigated. This paper probes the performance of ChatGPT, a sophisticated language model by OpenAI in tackling such complex reasoning tasks, using chess as a case study. Through robust metrics examining both the legality and quality of moves, we assess ChatGPT's understanding of the chessboard, adherence to chess rules, and strategic decision-making abilities. Our evaluation identifies limitations within ChatGPT's attention mechanism that affect its formal language comprehension and uncovers the model's underdeveloped self-regulation abilities. Our study also reveals ChatGPT's propensity for a coherent strategy in its gameplay and a noticeable uptick in decision-making assertiveness when the model is presented with a greater volume of natural language or possesses a more lucid understanding of the state of the chessboard. These findings contribute to the growing exploration of language models' abilities beyond natural language processing, providing valuable information for future research towards models demonstrating human-like cognitive abilities.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2023.
Builds on
19 of 31 references.
References · 19
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,708
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2020ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learningcited by 1,205
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2023A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivitycited by 894
- 2021Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?cited by 878
7 more
- 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 606
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
- 2022Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 596
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
- 2021Do Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of their Prompts?cited by 326
- 2021Chess as a Testbed for Language Model State Trackingcited by 72
- 2023Causal-Discovery Performance of ChatGPT in the context of Neuropathic Pain Diagnosiscited by 36
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMscited by 229
- 2024Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Modelcited by 113
- 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 99
- 2025A Comment On "The Illusion of Thinking": Reframing the Reasoning Cliff as an Agentic Gapcited by 8
- 2023Post Turing: Mapping the landscape of LLM Evaluationcited by 4
- 2024Reasoning, Memorization, and Fine-Tuning Language Models for Non-Cooperative Gamescited by 3
- 2026Disentangling generalization and memorization in large language models using chesscited by 1
- 2025PragWorld: A Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Local World Model under Minimal Linguistic Alterations and Conversational Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Do Chess Explanations Reflect Model Decisions? Behavioral and Token-Level Tests of LLM Reasoning Faithfulnesscited by 0
- 2026Do Chess Explanations Reflect Model Decisions? Behavioral and Token-Level Tests of LLM Reasoning Faithfulness5 Sep 2026
- 2026Disentangling generalization and memorization in large language models using chess23 Jan 2026
- 2025PragWorld: A Benchmark Evaluating LLMs' Local World Model under Minimal Linguistic Alterations and Conversational Dynamics17 Nov 2025
- 2025A Comment On "The Illusion of Thinking": Reframing the Reasoning Cliff as an Agentic Gap23 Jun 2025
- 2024Reasoning, Memorization, and Fine-Tuning Language Models for Non-Cooperative Games18 Oct 2024
- 2024Evaluating the World Model Implicit in a Generative Model6 Jun 2024
- 2024LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models1 Apr 2024
- 2024Leak, Cheat, Repeat: Data Contamination and Evaluation Malpractices in Closed-Source LLMs6 Feb 2024
- 2023Post Turing: Mapping the landscape of LLM Evaluation3 Nov 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ChessArena: A Chess Testbed for Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models
- 2024Explore the Reasoning Capability of LLMs in the Chess Testbed
- 2025LLM CHESS: Benchmarking Reasoning and Instruction-Following in LLMs through Chess
- 2026What Counts as Strategic Reasoning? A Systematic Mapping of Chess Research on Humans, Engines, and Language Models
- 2024Emergent World Models and Latent Variable Estimation in Chess-Playing Language Models
- 2026How Reasoning Evolves from Post-Training Data: An Empirical Study Using Chess
- 2024GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agents
- 2025Reasoning Can Hurt the Inductive Abilities of Large Language Models