mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Challenges of GPT-3-based Conversational Agents for Healthcare

arXiv 2308.14641 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The potential to provide patients with faster information access while allowing medical specialists to concentrate on critical tasks makes medical domain dialog agents appealing. However, the integration of large-language models (LLMs) into these agents presents certain limitations that may result in serious consequences. This paper investigates the challenges and risks of using GPT-3-based models for medical question-answering (MedQA). We perform several evaluations contextualized in terms of standard medical principles. We provide a procedure for manually designing patient queries to stress-test high-risk limitations of LLMs in MedQA systems. Our analysis reveals that LLMs fail to respond adequately to these queries, generating erroneous medical information, unsafe recommendations, and content that may be considered offensive.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2023.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  3. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
  4. 2023Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problemscited by 630
  5. 2022Can large language models reason about medical questions?cited by 194
  6. 2020A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Supportcited by 182
  7. 2020MedDialog: Two Large-scale Medical Dialogue Datasetscited by 157
  8. 2019Survey on Evaluation Methods for Dialogue Systemscited by 126
  9. 2017Ethical Challenges in Data-Driven Dialogue Systemscited by 86
  10. 2021Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Toolingcited by 77
  11. 2021On the Safety of Conversational Models: Taxonomy, Dataset, and Benchmarkcited by 73
  12. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 52
2 more
  1. 2022Computer says "No": The Case Against Empathetic Conversational AIcited by 9
  2. 2022A Critical Reflection and Forward Perspective on Empathy and Natural Language Processingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024LLM-MedQA: Enhancing Medical Question Answering through Case Studies in Large Language Models
  2. 2025AutoMedic: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Clinical Conversational Agents with Medical Dataset Grounding
  3. 2023Large Language Models Need Holistically Thought in Medical Conversational QA
  4. 2023DERA: Enhancing Large Language Model Completions with Dialog-Enabled Resolving Agents
  5. 2025RephQA: Evaluating Readability of Large Language Models in Public Health Question Answering
  6. 2025Conversation AI Dialog for Medicare powered by Finetuning and Retrieval Augmented Generation
  7. 2024Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model based systems
  8. 2026MedDialogRubrics: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Evaluation Framework for Multi-turn Medical Consultations in Large Language Models