mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Computer says "No": The Case Against Empathetic Conversational AI

arXiv 2212.10983 ↗First posted 21 Dec 2022cs.CL cs.HCcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emotions are an integral part of human cognition and they guide not only our understanding of the world but also our actions within it. As such, whether we soothe or flame an emotion is not inconsequential. Recent work in conversational AI has focused on responding empathetically to users, validating and soothing their emotions without a real basis. This AI-aided emotional regulation can have negative consequences for users and society, tending towards a one-noted happiness defined as only the absence of "negative" emotions. We argue that we must carefully consider whether and how to respond to users' emotions.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Dec 2022.

Builds on

3 of 27 references.

References · 3

  1. 2021Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Toolingcited by 78
  2. 2022Building a Dialogue Corpus Annotated with Expressed and Experienced Emotionscited by 4
  3. 2022A Critical Reflection and Forward Perspective on Empathy and Natural Language Processingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

9 papers.