mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Harnessing the Power of David against Goliath: Exploring Instruction Data Generation without Using Closed-Source Models

arXiv 2308.12711 ↗First posted 24 Aug 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning is instrumental in enabling Large Language Models~(LLMs) to follow user instructions to complete various open-domain tasks. The success of instruction tuning depends on the availability of high-quality instruction data. Owing to the exorbitant cost and substandard quality of human annotation, recent works have been deeply engaged in the exploration of the utilization of powerful closed-source models to generate instruction data automatically. However, these methods carry potential risks arising from the usage requirements of powerful closed-source models, which strictly forbid the utilization of their outputs to develop machine learning models. To deal with this problem, in this work, we explore alternative approaches to generate high-quality instruction data that do not rely on closed-source models. Our exploration includes an investigation of various existing instruction generation methods, culminating in the integration of the most efficient variant with two novel strategies to enhance the quality further. Evaluation results from two benchmarks and the GPT-4 model demonstrate the effectiveness of our generated instruction data, which can outperform Alpaca, a method reliant on closed-source models. We hope that more progress can be achieved in generating high-quality instruction data without using closed-source models.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2023.

Builds on

29 of 44 references.

References · 29

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  5. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  6. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  7. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  8. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  9. 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
  10. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  11. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  12. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
17 more
  1. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  2. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  3. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
  4. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
  5. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
  6. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  7. 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
  8. 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
  9. 2022OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalizationcited by 236
  10. 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 204
  11. 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 199
  12. 2018Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Trainingcited by 117
  13. 2023Maybe Only 0.5% Data is Needed: A Preliminary Exploration of Low Training Data Instruction Tuningcited by 58
  14. 2022ZeroPrompt: Scaling Prompt-Based Pretraining to 1,000 Tasks Improves Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 54
  15. 2023LongForm: Effective Instruction Tuning with Reverse Instructionscited by 47
  16. 2023Dynosaur: A Dynamic Growth Paradigm for Instruction-Tuning Data Curationcited by 38
  17. 2022Learning Instructions with Unlabeled Data for Zero-Shot Cross-Task Generalizationcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.