Harnessing the Power of David against Goliath: Exploring Instruction Data Generation without Using Closed-Source Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction tuning is instrumental in enabling Large Language Models~(LLMs) to follow user instructions to complete various open-domain tasks. The success of instruction tuning depends on the availability of high-quality instruction data. Owing to the exorbitant cost and substandard quality of human annotation, recent works have been deeply engaged in the exploration of the utilization of powerful closed-source models to generate instruction data automatically. However, these methods carry potential risks arising from the usage requirements of powerful closed-source models, which strictly forbid the utilization of their outputs to develop machine learning models. To deal with this problem, in this work, we explore alternative approaches to generate high-quality instruction data that do not rely on closed-source models. Our exploration includes an investigation of various existing instruction generation methods, culminating in the integration of the most efficient variant with two novel strategies to enhance the quality further. Evaluation results from two benchmarks and the GPT-4 model demonstrate the effectiveness of our generated instruction data, which can outperform Alpaca, a method reliant on closed-source models. We hope that more progress can be achieved in generating high-quality instruction data without using closed-source models.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2023.
Builds on
29 of 44 references.
References · 29
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
- 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
17 more
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 839
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
- 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
- 2023Principle-Driven Self-Alignment of Language Models from Scratch with Minimal Human Supervisioncited by 318
- 2022OPT-IML: Scaling Language Model Instruction Meta Learning through the Lens of Generalizationcited by 236
- 2018WikiHow: A Large Scale Text Summarization Datasetcited by 204
- 2018Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encodercited by 199
- 2018Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Trainingcited by 117
- 2023Maybe Only 0.5% Data is Needed: A Preliminary Exploration of Low Training Data Instruction Tuningcited by 58
- 2022ZeroPrompt: Scaling Prompt-Based Pretraining to 1,000 Tasks Improves Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 54
- 2023LongForm: Effective Instruction Tuning with Reverse Instructionscited by 47
- 2023Dynosaur: A Dynamic Growth Paradigm for Instruction-Tuning Data Curationcited by 38
- 2022Learning Instructions with Unlabeled Data for Zero-Shot Cross-Task Generalizationcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Data Management For Training Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 17
- 2024SMART: Submodular Data Mixture Strategy for Instruction Tuningcited by 17
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Domain Taskscited by 12
- 2026Execution-First Synthetic Tool-Use Trace Generation for LLM Agentscited by 2
- 2025XL-Suite: Cross-Lingual Synthetic Training and Evaluation Data for Open-Ended Generationcited by 1
- 2025Evolution without Large Models: Training Language Model with Task Principlescited by 0
- 2026Execution-First Synthetic Tool-Use Trace Generation for LLM Agents31 Jul 2026
- 2025Evolution without Large Models: Training Language Model with Task Principles8 Jul 2025
- 2025XL-Suite: Cross-Lingual Synthetic Training and Evaluation Data for Open-Ended Generation29 Mar 2025
- 2024SMART: Submodular Data Mixture Strategy for Instruction Tuning13 Mar 2024
- 2024Retrieval-Augmented Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Domain Tasks21 Feb 2024
- 2023Data Management For Training Large Language Models: A Survey4 Dec 2023