mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Learning Instructions with Unlabeled Data for Zero-Shot Cross-Task Generalization

arXiv 2210.09175 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2022cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training language models to learn from human instructions for zero-shot cross-task generalization has attracted much attention in NLP communities. Recently, instruction tuning (IT), which fine-tunes a pre-trained language model on a massive collection of tasks described via human-craft instructions, has been shown effective in instruction learning for unseen tasks. However, IT relies on a large amount of human-annotated samples, which restricts its generalization. Unlike labeled data, unlabeled data are often massive and cheap to obtain. In this work, we study how IT can be improved with unlabeled data. We first empirically explore the IT performance trends versus the number of labeled data, instructions, and training tasks. We find it critical to enlarge the number of training instructions, and the instructions can be underutilized due to the scarcity of labeled data. Then, we propose Unlabeled Data Augmented Instruction Tuning (UDIT) to take better advantage of the instructions during IT by constructing pseudo-labeled data from unlabeled plain texts. We conduct extensive experiments to show UDIT's effectiveness in various scenarios of tasks and datasets. We also comprehensively analyze the key factors of UDIT to investigate how to better improve IT with unlabeled data. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/thu-coai/UDIT.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 65 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2022.

Builds on

65 of 97 references.

References · 65

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,856
  5. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  6. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,322
  7. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,494
  8. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,884
  9. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,133
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,053
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,765
  12. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,716
38 more
  1. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,779
  2. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,319
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,229
  4. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,468
  5. 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,376
  6. 2018Don't Give Me the Details, Just the Summary! Topic-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks for Extreme Summarizationcited by 1,312
  7. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,289
  8. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,288
  9. 2017Mixed Precision Trainingcited by 1,147
  10. 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,126
  11. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,058
  12. 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,042
  13. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 804
  14. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  15. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 751
  16. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 697
  17. 2019SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 533
  18. 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 529
  19. 2019Multi-News: a Large-Scale Multi-Document Summarization Dataset and Abstractive Hierarchical Modelcited by 429
  20. 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 414
  21. 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 400
  22. 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 371
  23. 2021Pre-Trained Models: Past, Present and Futurecited by 319
  24. 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 288
  25. 2019Cosmos QA: Machine Reading Comprehension with Contextual Commonsense Reasoningcited by 282
  26. 2019QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Compositioncited by 250
  27. 2015Semi-Supervised Learning with Ladder Networkscited by 247
  28. 2014Learning with Pseudo-Ensemblescited by 241
  29. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  30. 2017Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension Across Documentscited by 190
  31. 2020CERT: Contrastive Self-supervised Learning for Language Understandingcited by 169
  32. 2019DREAM: A Challenge Dataset and Models for Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehensioncited by 156
  33. 2022What Language Model Architecture and Pretraining Objective Work Best for Zero-Shot Generalization?cited by 150
  34. 2021CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLPcited by 142
  35. 2019Quoref: A Reading Comprehension Dataset with Questions Requiring Coreferential Reasoningcited by 100
  36. 2020Self-training Improves Pre-training for Natural Language Understandingcited by 96
  37. 2019QuaRTz: An Open-Domain Dataset of Qualitative Relationship Questionscited by 89
  38. 2020The Turking Test: Can Language Models Understand Instructions?cited by 82

50 most cited of 65 All 65 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 8; 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: