mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Execution-First Synthetic Tool-Use Trace Generation for LLM Agents

arXiv 2607.29175 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2026cs.SEcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Agentic software-engineering and industrial systems increasingly operate through executable workflows rather than code genera- tion alone: they search artifacts, invoke tools, inspect structured observations, and query databases. Training these agents requires supervision data that captures valid tool interactions and executable workflows. However, traditional query-first data synthesis can fail because plausible user requests may not correspond to valid tool sequences, compatible parameters, or available data. To address this limitation, we propose SyntheticAgentTraceQA, an execution- first framework for generating scalable supervision data for tool- augmented agents. Our framework first constructs high-level work- flow structures, maps them to available tools through dependency- aware assignment, executes and validates the resulting traces in con- trolled environments, and only then synthesizes natural-language user tasks, teacher-generated reasoning annotations, and reference answers. We evaluate the framework across four tool ecosystems and use the resulting data to fine-tune and evaluate Qwen model variants. The results show that execution-grounded supervision improves tool execution behavior, reference-trace agreement, and answer-generation performance on the evaluated tasks. Further analysis reveals a supervision trade-off: masked supervision, which excludes reasoning annotations from the training objective, im- proves final-answer metrics, whereas full supervision, computing loss over the complete assistant output including reasoning tokens, underperforms on answer quality and does not consistently im- prove reference-trace agreement, particularly at the 9B scale. These findings highlight the importance of designing synthetic supervi- sion according to the desired capabilities of tool-augmented agents.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2026.

Builds on

29 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development16 Jan
  2. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering6 May

Other references · 27

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  3. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  4. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  5. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  6. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  7. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  8. 2023API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMscited by 574
  9. 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Casescited by 383
  10. 2024ToolSandbox: A Stateful, Conversational, Interactive Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Tool Use Capabilitiescited by 272
  11. 2024A Survey on Data Selection for LLM Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  12. 2025TOUCAN: Synthesizing 1.5M Tool-Agentic Data from Real-World MCP Environmentscited by 61
15 more
  1. 2024ToolNet: Connecting Large Language Models with Massive Tools via Tool Graphcited by 59
  2. 2025AgentSynth: Scalable Task Generation for Generalist Computer-Use Agentscited by 41
  3. 2024Middleware for LLMs: Tools Are Instrumental for Language Agents in Complex Environmentscited by 39
  4. 2025ToolMind Technical Report: A Large-Scale, Reasoning-Enhanced Tool-Use Datasetcited by 27
  5. 2026Benchmarking LLM Tool-Use in the Wildcited by 15
  6. 2026AgentLens: Revealing The Lucky Pass Problem in SWE-Agent Evaluationcited by 13
  7. 2026Autodata: An agentic data scientist to create high quality synthetic datacited by 12
  8. 2026Which Reasoning Trajectories Teach Students to Reason Better? A Simple Metric of Informative Alignmentcited by 10
  9. 2026From Failure to Mastery: Generating Hard Samples for Tool-use Agentscited by 8
  10. 2026ToolFailBench: Diagnosing Tool-Use Failures in LLM Agentscited by 8
  11. 2026How to Fine-Tune a Reasoning Model? A Teacher-Student Cooperation Framework to Synthesize Student-Consistent SFT Datacited by 7
  12. 2023Harnessing the Power of David against Goliath: Exploring Instruction Data Generation without Using Closed-Source Modelscited by 6
  13. 2025Why Johnny Can't Use Agents: Industry Aspirations vs. User Realities with AI Agentscited by 5
  14. 2025ToolGrad: Efficient Tool-use Dataset Generation with Textual "Gradients"cited by 4
  15. 2026ISE: An Execution-Grounded Recipe for Multi-Turn OS-Agent Trajectoriescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning to Rewrite Tool Descriptions for Reliable LLM-Agent Tool Use
  2. 2026TraceCompiler: Skill-Guided Mining and Compilation of LLM Agent Traces into Mostly Deterministic Workflows
  3. 2026FlowScout: From Execution Feedback to Reliable Tool-Using Agent Workflows
  4. 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization
  5. 2026AgentEscapeBench: Evaluating Out-of-Domain Tool-Grounded Reasoning in LLM Agents
  6. 2026EDGEGEN: Improving Tool-Calling Agents Beyond Happy Paths with Synthetic Edge Case Generation
  7. 2026AgentProcessBench: Diagnosing Step-Level Process Quality in Tool-Using Agents
  8. 2025AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production