MARC: Multipolicy and Risk-aware Contingency Planning for Autonomous Driving
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generating safe and non-conservative behaviors in dense, dynamic environments remains challenging for automated vehicles due to the stochastic nature of traffic participants' behaviors and their implicit interaction with the ego vehicle. This paper presents a novel planning framework, Multipolicy And Risk-aware Contingency planning (MARC), that systematically addresses these challenges by enhancing the multipolicy-based pipelines from both behavior and motion planning aspects. Specifically, MARC realizes a critical scenario set that reflects multiple possible futures conditioned on each semantic-level ego policy. Then, the generated policy-conditioned scenarios are further formulated into a tree-structured representation with a dynamic branchpoint based on the scene-level divergence. Moreover, to generate diverse driving maneuvers, we introduce risk-aware contingency planning, a bi-level optimization algorithm that simultaneously considers multiple future scenarios and user-defined risk tolerance levels. Owing to the more unified combination of behavior and motion planning layers, our framework achieves efficient decision-making and human-like driving maneuvers. Comprehensive experimental results demonstrate superior performance to other strong baselines in various environments.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2024ModeSeq: Taming Sparse Multimodal Motion Prediction with Sequential Mode Modelingcited by 7
- 2023Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictionscited by 4
- 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysiscited by 3
- 2024Integrated Decision Making and Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving Under Multimodal Uncertainties: A Bayesian Game Approachcited by 2
- 2024PMM-Net: Single-stage Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction with Patching-based Embedding and Explicit Modal Modulationcited by 1
- 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safetycited by 1
- 2024Bench4Merge: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Merging in Realistic Dense Traffic with Micro-Interactive Vehiclescited by 0
- 2025Robust Planning for Autonomous Driving via Mixed Adversarial Diffusion Predictionscited by 0
- 2026Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst: Occlusion-Aware Contingency Planning for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 0
- 2026Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst: Occlusion-Aware Contingency Planning for Autonomous Vehicles3 Jul 2026
- 2025Robust Planning for Autonomous Driving via Mixed Adversarial Diffusion Predictions18 May 2025
- 2025Navigating the Edge with the State-of-the-Art Insights into Corner Case Identification and Generation for Enhanced Autonomous Vehicle Safety27 Feb 2025
- 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysis20 Dec 2024
- 2024ModeSeq: Taming Sparse Multimodal Motion Prediction with Sequential Mode Modeling17 Nov 2024
- 2024PMM-Net: Single-stage Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction with Patching-based Embedding and Explicit Modal Modulation25 Oct 2024
- 2024Bench4Merge: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Merging in Realistic Dense Traffic with Micro-Interactive Vehicles21 Oct 2024
- 2024Integrated Decision Making and Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Driving Under Multimodal Uncertainties: A Bayesian Game Approach21 Sep 2024
- 2023Predictive Control for Autonomous Driving with Uncertain, Multi-modal Predictions31 Oct 2023