mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scene-Aware Feature Matching

arXiv 2308.09949 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current feature matching methods focus on point-level matching, pursuing better representation learning of individual features, but lacking further understanding of the scene. This results in significant performance degradation when handling challenging scenes such as scenes with large viewpoint and illumination changes. To tackle this problem, we propose a novel model named SAM, which applies attentional grouping to guide Scene-Aware feature Matching. SAM handles multi-level features, i.e., image tokens and group tokens, with attention layers, and groups the image tokens with the proposed token grouping module. Our model can be trained by ground-truth matches only and produce reasonable grouping results. With the sense-aware grouping guidance, SAM is not only more accurate and robust but also more interpretable than conventional feature matching models. Sufficient experiments on various applications, including homography estimation, pose estimation, and image matching, demonstrate that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2023.

Builds on

28 of 41 references.

References · 28

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  4. 2019SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networkscited by 1,443
  5. 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
  6. 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
  7. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 767
  8. 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
  9. 2022GroupViT: Semantic Segmentation Emerges from Text Supervisioncited by 531
  10. 2016Direct Sparse Odometrycited by 485
  11. 2018Efficient Attention: Attention with Linear Complexitiescited by 368
  12. 2019D2-Net: A Trainable CNN for Joint Detection and Description of Local Featurescited by 326
16 more
  1. 2017HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptorscited by 264
  2. 2016Towards K-means-friendly Spaces: Simultaneous Deep Learning and Clusteringcited by 237
  3. 2018Revisiting Oxford and Paris: Large-Scale Image Retrieval Benchmarkingcited by 191
  4. 2017Learning to Find Good Correspondencescited by 176
  5. 2018Neighbourhood Consensus Networkscited by 174
  6. 2018LF-Net: Learning Local Features from Imagescited by 151
  7. 2017Learning Discrete Representations via Information Maximizing Self-Augmented Trainingcited by 149
  8. 2019Learning Two-View Correspondences and Geometry Using Order-Aware Networkcited by 149
  9. 2020Patch2Pix: Epipolar-Guided Pixel-Level Correspondencescited by 129
  10. 2022MatchFormer: Interleaving Attention in Transformers for Feature Matchingcited by 126
  11. 2020Learning Feature Descriptors using Camera Pose Supervisioncited by 104
  12. 2020Dual-Resolution Correspondence Networkscited by 90
  13. 2022Guide Local Feature Matching by Overlap Estimationcited by 24
  14. 2017CNN-Based Joint Clustering and Representation Learning with Feature Drift Compensation for Large-Scale Image Datacited by 16
  15. 2023ParaFormer: Parallel Attention Transformer for Efficient Feature Matchingcited by 9
  16. 2020Learning to Guide Local Feature Matchescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.