Precision and Recall Reject Curves for Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For some classification scenarios, it is desirable to use only those classification instances that a trained model associates with a high certainty. To obtain such high-certainty instances, previous work has proposed accuracy-reject curves. Reject curves allow to evaluate and compare the performance of different certainty measures over a range of thresholds for accepting or rejecting classifications. However, the accuracy may not be the most suited evaluation metric for all applications, and instead precision or recall may be preferable. This is the case, for example, for data with imbalanced class distributions. We therefore propose reject curves that evaluate precision and recall, the recall-reject curve and the precision-reject curve. Using prototype-based classifiers from learning vector quantization, we first validate the proposed curves on artificial benchmark data against the accuracy reject curve as a baseline. We then show on imbalanced benchmarks and medical, real-world data that for these scenarios, the proposed precision- and recall-curves yield more accurate insights into classifier performance than accuracy reject curves.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2023.
Builds on
6 of 38 references.
References · 6
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 107
- 2021Optimal strategies for reject option classifierscited by 61
- 2015Performance measures for classification systems with rejectioncited by 16
- 2022Explaining Reject Options of Learning Vector Quantization Classifierscited by 7
- 2022Model Agnostic Local Explanations of Rejectcited by 7
- 2023Explainable Human-Robot Training and Cooperation with Augmented Realitycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.