mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance measures for classification systems with rejection

arXiv 1504.02763 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2015cs.CV cs.LGcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classifiers with rejection are essential in real-world applications where misclassifications and their effects are critical. However, if no problem specific cost function is defined, there are no established measures to assess the performance of such classifiers. We introduce a set of desired properties for performance measures for classifiers with rejection, based on which we propose a set of three performance measures for the evaluation of the performance of classifiers with rejection that satisfy the desired properties. The nonrejected accuracy measures the ability of the classifier to accurately classify nonrejected samples; the classification quality measures the correct decision making of the classifier with rejector; and the rejection quality measures the ability to concentrate all misclassified samples onto the set of rejected samples. From the measures, we derive the concept of relative optimality that allows us to connect the measures to a family of cost functions that take into account the trade-off between rejection and misclassification. We illustrate the use of the proposed performance measures on classifiers with rejection applied to synthetic and real-world data.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2015.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: