mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Model Agnostic Local Explanations of Reject

arXiv 2205.07623 ↗First posted 16 May 2022cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The application of machine learning based decision making systems in safety critical areas requires reliable high certainty predictions. Reject options are a common way of ensuring a sufficiently high certainty of predictions made by the system. While being able to reject uncertain samples is important, it is also of importance to be able to explain why a particular sample was rejected. However, explaining general reject options is still an open problem. We propose a model agnostic method for locally explaining arbitrary reject options by means of interpretable models and counterfactual explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2022.

Builds on

9 of 21 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  3. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning framework for Autonomous Drivingcited by 224
  4. 2019Interpretable Counterfactual Explanations Guided by Prototypescited by 223
  5. 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 107
  6. 2020Convex Density Constraints for Computing Plausible Counterfactual Explanationscited by 32
  7. 2018Examining Deep Learning Architectures for Crime Classification and Predictioncited by 7
  8. 2022Explaining Reject Options of Learning Vector Quantization Classifierscited by 7
  9. 2021Convex optimization for actionable & plausible counterfactual explanationscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

7 papers.