mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Ranking-aware Uncertainty for Text-guided Image Retrieval

arXiv 2308.08131 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-guided image retrieval is to incorporate conditional text to better capture users' intent. Traditionally, the existing methods focus on minimizing the embedding distances between the source inputs and the targeted image, using the provided triplets langlesource image, source text, target imagerangle. However, such triplet optimization may limit the learned retrieval model to capture more detailed ranking information, e.g., the triplets are one-to-one correspondences and they fail to account for many-to-many correspondences arising from semantic diversity in feedback languages and images. To capture more ranking information, we propose a novel ranking-aware uncertainty approach to model many-to-many correspondences by only using the provided triplets. We introduce uncertainty learning to learn the stochastic ranking list of features. Specifically, our approach mainly comprises three components: (1) In-sample uncertainty, which aims to capture semantic diversity using a Gaussian distribution derived from both combined and target features; (2) Cross-sample uncertainty, which further mines the ranking information from other samples' distributions; and (3) Distribution regularization, which aligns the distributional representations of source inputs and targeted image. Compared to the existing state-of-the-art methods, our proposed method achieves significant results on two public datasets for composed image retrieval.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2023.

Builds on

23 of 34 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,426
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,624
  6. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,430
  7. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,340
  8. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,306
  9. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,226
  10. 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,227
  11. 2017A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embeddingcited by 318
  12. 2021Image Retrieval on Real-life Images with Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Modelscited by 249
11 more
  1. 2018Composing Text and Image for Image Retrieval - An Empirical Odysseycited by 236
  2. 2021Probabilistic Embeddings for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 150
  3. 2018Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detectioncited by 143
  4. 2022ARTEMIS: Attention-based Retrieval with Text-Explicit Matching and Implicit Similaritycited by 83
  5. 2020Modality-Agnostic Attention Fusion for visual search with text feedbackcited by 51
  6. 2022Composed Image Retrieval with Text Feedback via Multi-grained Uncertainty Regularizationcited by 45
  7. 2019Fashion IQ: A New Dataset Towards Retrieving Images by Natural Language Feedbackcited by 43
  8. 2016Multimodal Residual Learning for Visual QAcited by 42
  9. 2020Bayesian Triplet Loss: Uncertainty Quantification in Image Retrievalcited by 31
  10. 2022Probabilistic Compositional Embeddings for Multimodal Image Retrievalcited by 29
  11. 2020Deep Multi-View Enhancement Hashing for Image Retrievalcited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

5 papers.