Boosting Cross-Quality Face Verification using Blind Face Restoration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, various Blind Face Restoration (BFR) techniques were developed. These techniques transform low quality faces suffering from multiple degradations to more realistic and natural face images with high perceptual quality. However, it is crucial for the task of face verification to not only enhance the perceptual quality of the low quality images but also to improve the biometric-utility face quality metrics. Furthermore, preserving the valuable identity information is of great importance. In this paper, we investigate the impact of applying three state-of-the-art blind face restoration techniques namely, GFP-GAN, GPEN and SGPN on the performance of face verification system under very challenging environment characterized by very low quality images. Extensive experimental results on the recently proposed cross-quality LFW database using three state-of-the-art deep face recognition models demonstrate the effectiveness of GFP-GAN in boosting significantly the face verification accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2023.
Builds on
31 of 46 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
- 2016Joint Face Detection and Alignment using Multi-task Cascaded Convolutional Networkscited by 903
- 2014Learning Face Representation from Scratchcited by 453
- 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 391
- 2017DeblurGAN: Blind Motion Deblurring Using Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 367
- 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
- 2021Towards Real-World Blind Face Restoration with Generative Facial Priorcited by 349
- 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 334
19 more
- 2018Deep Face Recognition: A Surveycited by 276
- 2021GAN Prior Embedded Network for Blind Face Restoration in the Wildcited by 197
- 2015Learning a Convolutional Neural Network for Non-uniform Motion Blur Removalcited by 149
- 2020Progressive Semantic-Aware Style Transformation for Blind Face Restorationcited by 99
- 2018Learning Warped Guidance for Blind Face Restorationcited by 87
- 2022RestoreFormer: High-Quality Blind Face Restoration from Undegraded Key-Value Pairscited by 85
- 2020Face Image Quality Assessment: A Literature Surveycited by 80
- 2020HiFaceGAN: Face Renovation via Collaborative Suppression and Replenishmentcited by 70
- 2021CR-FIQA: Face Image Quality Assessment by Learning Sample Relative Classifiabilitycited by 69
- 2020Learning Spatial Attention for Face Super-Resolutioncited by 55
- 2022WebFace260M: A Benchmark for Million-Scale Deep Face Recognitioncited by 42
- 2017Deep Generative Adversarial Compression Artifact Removalcited by 38
- 2021Cross-Quality LFW: A Database for Analyzing Cross-Resolution Image Face Recognition in Unconstrained Environmentscited by 34
- 2020The Elements of End-to-end Deep Face Recognition: A Survey of Recent Advancescited by 32
- 2015A Review Paper: Noise Models in Digital Image Processingcited by 24
- 2018Face Recognition in Low Quality Images: A Surveycited by 18
- 2022Deep Face Restoration: A Surveycited by 17
- 2022Blind Face Restoration: Benchmark Datasets and a Baseline Modelcited by 10
- 2022OCFR 2022: Competition on Occluded Face Recognition From Synthetically Generated Structure-Aware Occlusionscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.