Addressing Racial Bias in Facial Emotion Recognition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness in deep learning models trained with high-dimensional inputs and subjective labels remains a complex and understudied area. Facial emotion recognition, a domain where datasets are often racially imbalanced, can lead to models that yield disparate outcomes across racial groups. This study focuses on analyzing racial bias by sub-sampling training sets with varied racial distributions and assessing test performance across these simulations. Our findings indicate that smaller datasets with posed faces improve on both fairness and performance metrics as the simulations approach racial balance. Notably, the F1-score increases by 27.2% points, and demographic parity increases by 15.7% points on average across the simulations. However, in larger datasets with greater facial variation, fairness metrics generally remain constant, suggesting that racial balance by itself is insufficient to achieve parity in test performance across different racial groups.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2023.
Builds on
20 of 45 references.
References · 20
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 490
- 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
- 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 301
- 2018Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 269
- 2018DialogueRNN: An Attentive RNN for Emotion Detection in Conversationscited by 216
- 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 194
- 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 139
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
- 2020Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 87
8 more
- 2021Understanding and Mitigating Annotation Bias in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 50
- 2021Responsible AI: Gender bias assessment in emotion recognitioncited by 22
- 2015Do Deep Neural Networks Learn Facial Action Units When Doing Expression Recognition?cited by 19
- 2017Facial Expression Recognition Using Enhanced Deep 3D Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2019Affective Computing for Large-Scale Heterogeneous Multimedia Data: A Surveycited by 17
- 2019Fairness and Missing Valuescited by 16
- 2020Improved Digital Therapy for Developmental Pediatrics Using Domain-Specific Artificial Intelligence: Machine Learning Studycited by 10
- 2021Training Affective Computer Vision Models by Crowdsourcing Soft-Target Labelscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2024From Bias to Balance: Detecting Facial Expression Recognition Biases in Large Multimodal Foundation Modelscited by 1
- 2025TrustSkin: A Fairness Pipeline for Trustworthy Facial Affect Analysis Across Skin Tonecited by 0
- 2025Modeling Cultural Bias in Facial Expression Recognition with Adaptive Agentscited by 0
- 2025A Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Emotion Recognition in Children with Autism During NAO Robot-Mediated Interactioncited by 0
- 2025A Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Emotion Recognition in Children with Autism During NAO Robot-Mediated Interaction13 Dec 2025
- 2025Modeling Cultural Bias in Facial Expression Recognition with Adaptive Agents15 Oct 2025
- 2025TrustSkin: A Fairness Pipeline for Trustworthy Facial Affect Analysis Across Skin Tone27 May 2025
- 2024From Bias to Balance: Detecting Facial Expression Recognition Biases in Large Multimodal Foundation Models27 Aug 2024