mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Modeling Cultural Bias in Facial Expression Recognition with Adaptive Agents

arXiv 2510.13557 ↗First posted 15 Oct 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Facial expression recognition (FER) must remain robust under both cultural variation and perceptually degraded visual conditions, yet most existing evaluations assume homogeneous data and high-quality imagery. We introduce an agent-based, streaming benchmark that reveals how cross-cultural composition and progressive blurring interact to shape face recognition robustness. Each agent operates in a frozen CLIP feature space with a lightweight residual adapter trained online at sigma=0 and fixed during testing. Agents move and interact on a 5x5 lattice, while the environment provides inputs with sigma-scheduled Gaussian blur. We examine monocultural populations (Western-only, Asian-only) and mixed environments with balanced (5/5) and imbalanced (8/2, 2/8) compositions, as well as different spatial contact structures. Results show clear asymmetric degradation curves between cultural groups: JAFFE (Asian) populations maintain higher performance at low blur but exhibit sharper drops at intermediate stages, whereas KDEF (Western) populations degrade more uniformly. Mixed populations exhibit intermediate patterns, with balanced mixtures mitigating early degradation, but imbalanced settings amplify majority-group weaknesses under high blur. These findings quantify how cultural composition and interaction structure influence the robustness of FER as perceptual conditions deteriorate.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Oct 2025.

Builds on

9 of 30 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,588
  2. 2022Reproducible scaling laws for contrastive language-image learningcited by 1,164
  3. 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 491
  4. 2015Going Deeper in Facial Expression Recognition using Deep Neural Networkscited by 43
  5. 2024Who's in and who's out? A case study of multimodal CLIP-filtering in DataCompcited by 15
  6. 2023Addressing Racial Bias in Facial Emotion Recognitioncited by 4
  7. 2025Wrong Face, Wrong Move: The Social Dynamics of Emotion Misperception in Agent-Based Modelscited by 3
  8. 2016EmoFit: Affect Monitoring System for Sedentary Jobscited by 2
  9. 2024From Bias to Balance: Detecting Facial Expression Recognition Biases in Large Multimodal Foundation Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.