Unsupervised Adversarial Detection without Extra Model: Training Loss Should Change
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial robustness poses a critical challenge in the deployment of deep learning models for real-world applications. Traditional approaches to adversarial training and supervised detection rely on prior knowledge of attack types and access to labeled training data, which is often impractical. Existing unsupervised adversarial detection methods identify whether the target model works properly, but they suffer from bad accuracies owing to the use of common cross-entropy training loss, which relies on unnecessary features and strengthens adversarial attacks. We propose new training losses to reduce useless features and the corresponding detection method without prior knowledge of adversarial attacks. The detection rate (true positive rate) against all given white-box attacks is above 93.9% except for attacks without limits (DF(∞)), while the false positive rate is barely 2.5%. The proposed method works well in all tested attack types and the false positive rates are even better than the methods good at certain types.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2023.
Builds on
17 of 19 references.
References · 17
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
- 2018Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0cited by 214
5 more
- 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
- 2021Adversarial Example Detection for DNN Models: A Review and Experimental Comparisoncited by 51
- 2021LiBRe: A Practical Bayesian Approach to Adversarial Detectioncited by 40
- 2019Deep Neural Rejection against Adversarial Examplescited by 31
- 2021Revisiting Model's Uncertainty and Confidences for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Adversarial Attack Detectioncited by 4
- 2025Pulling Back the Curtain: Unsupervised Adversarial Detection via Contrastive Auxiliary Networkscited by 1
- 2024Resilience and Security of Deep Neural Networks Against Intentional and Unintentional Perturbations: Survey and Research Challengescited by 0
- 2025From Pixels to Trajectory: Universal Adversarial Example Detection via Temporal Imprintscited by 0
- 2025From Pixels to Trajectory: Universal Adversarial Example Detection via Temporal Imprints6 Mar 2025
- 2025Pulling Back the Curtain: Unsupervised Adversarial Detection via Contrastive Auxiliary Networks13 Feb 2025
- 2024Resilience and Security of Deep Neural Networks Against Intentional and Unintentional Perturbations: Survey and Research Challenges31 Jul 2024
- 2024Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Adversarial Attack Detection5 Jul 2024