Cal-SFDA: Source-Free Domain-adaptive Semantic Segmentation with Differentiable Expected Calibration Error
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The prevalence of domain adaptive semantic segmentation has prompted concerns regarding source domain data leakage, where private information from the source domain could inadvertently be exposed in the target domain. To circumvent the requirement for source data, source-free domain adaptation has emerged as a viable solution that leverages self-training methods to pseudo-label high-confidence regions and adapt the model to the target data. However, the confidence scores obtained are often highly biased due to over-confidence and class-imbalance issues, which render both model selection and optimization problematic. In this paper, we propose a novel calibration-guided source-free domain adaptive semantic segmentation (Cal-SFDA) framework. The core idea is to estimate the expected calibration error (ECE) from the segmentation predictions, serving as a strong indicator of the model's generalization capability to the unlabeled target domain. The estimated ECE scores, in turn, assist the model training and fair selection in both source training and target adaptation stages. During model pre-training on the source domain, we ensure the differentiability of the ECE objective by leveraging the LogSumExp trick and using ECE scores to select the best source checkpoints for adaptation. To enable ECE estimation on the target domain without requiring labels, we train a value net for ECE estimation and apply statistic warm-up on its BatchNorm layers for stability. The estimated ECE scores assist in determining the reliability of prediction and enable class-balanced pseudo-labeling by positively guiding the adaptation progress and inhibiting potential error accumulation. Extensive experiments on two widely-used synthetic-to-real transfer tasks show that the proposed approach surpasses previous state-of-the-art by up to 5.25% of mIoU with fair model selection criteria.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2023.
Builds on
41 of 59 references.
References · 41
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
- 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 818
- 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
- 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
- 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
- 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 541
- 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
- 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 419
29 more
- 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 417
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 309
- 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
- 2020PseudoSeg: Designing Pseudo Labels for Semantic Segmentationcited by 180
- 2021Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 168
- 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 156
- 2021Model Adaptation: Historical Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 152
- 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
- 2019Domain Adaptation for Structured Output via Discriminative Patch Representationscited by 150
- 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
- 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 92
- 2018Visual Domain Adaptation with Manifold Embedded Distribution Alignmentcited by 91
- 2021Generalize then Adapt: Source-Free Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 81
- 2019Significance-aware Information Bottleneck for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 74
- 2022Balancing Discriminability and Transferability for Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 58
- 2021Semantics Disentangling for Generalized Zero-Shot Learningcited by 56
- 2021DeepGaze IIE: Calibrated prediction in and out-of-domain for state-of-the-art saliency modelingcited by 56
- 2022Class-Balanced Pixel-Level Self-Labeling for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 47
- 2020Calibrated Prediction with Covariate Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 43
- 2021Source-Free Open Compound Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 43
- 2021Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation without Source Datacited by 30
- 2020Rethinking Generative Zero-Shot Learning: An Ensemble Learning Perspective for Recognising Visual Patchescited by 27
- 2023Dirichlet-based Uncertainty Calibration for Active Domain Adaptationcited by 24
- 2021Fast Batch Nuclear-norm Maximization and Minimization for Robust Domain Adaptationcited by 14
- 2021Mitigating Generation Shifts for Generalized Zero-Shot Learningcited by 13
- 2022Discovering Domain Disentanglement for Generalized Multi-source Domain Adaptationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Surveycited by 44
- 2024Bayesian-guided Label Mapping for Visual Reprogrammingcited by 12
- 2024Edit-Your-Motion: Space-Time Diffusion Decoupling Learning for Video Motion Editingcited by 10
- 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 7
- 2025SVIP: Semantically Contextualized Visual Patches for Zero-Shot Learningcited by 6
- 2024DPO: Dual-Perturbation Optimization for Test-time Adaptation in 3D Object Detectioncited by 5
- 2024Is Less More? Exploring Token Condensation as Training-free Test-time Adaptationcited by 4
- 2025DUDA: Distilled Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Lightweight Semantic Segmentationcited by 3
- 2025Distributed Zero-Shot Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 3
- 2026Unsupervised Collaborative Domain Adaptation for Driving Scene Parsingcited by 0
- 2026Unsupervised Collaborative Domain Adaptation for Driving Scene Parsing1 Jun 2026
- 2025Distributed Zero-Shot Learning for Visual Recognition11 Nov 2025
- 2025DUDA: Distilled Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Lightweight Semantic Segmentation14 Apr 2025
- 2025SVIP: Semantically Contextualized Visual Patches for Zero-Shot Learning13 Mar 2025
- 2024Bayesian-guided Label Mapping for Visual Reprogramming31 Oct 2024
- 2024Is Less More? Exploring Token Condensation as Training-free Test-time Adaptation16 Oct 2024
- 2024MOS: Model Synergy for Test-Time Adaptation on LiDAR-Based 3D Object Detection21 Jun 2024
- 2024DPO: Dual-Perturbation Optimization for Test-time Adaptation in 3D Object Detection19 Jun 2024
- 2024Edit-Your-Motion: Space-Time Diffusion Decoupling Learning for Video Motion Editing7 May 2024
- 2023In Search of Lost Online Test-time Adaptation: A Survey31 Oct 2023