mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cal-SFDA: Source-Free Domain-adaptive Semantic Segmentation with Differentiable Expected Calibration Error

arXiv 2308.03003 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The prevalence of domain adaptive semantic segmentation has prompted concerns regarding source domain data leakage, where private information from the source domain could inadvertently be exposed in the target domain. To circumvent the requirement for source data, source-free domain adaptation has emerged as a viable solution that leverages self-training methods to pseudo-label high-confidence regions and adapt the model to the target data. However, the confidence scores obtained are often highly biased due to over-confidence and class-imbalance issues, which render both model selection and optimization problematic. In this paper, we propose a novel calibration-guided source-free domain adaptive semantic segmentation (Cal-SFDA) framework. The core idea is to estimate the expected calibration error (ECE) from the segmentation predictions, serving as a strong indicator of the model's generalization capability to the unlabeled target domain. The estimated ECE scores, in turn, assist the model training and fair selection in both source training and target adaptation stages. During model pre-training on the source domain, we ensure the differentiability of the ECE objective by leveraging the LogSumExp trick and using ECE scores to select the best source checkpoints for adaptation. To enable ECE estimation on the target domain without requiring labels, we train a value net for ECE estimation and apply statistic warm-up on its BatchNorm layers for stability. The estimated ECE scores assist in determining the reliability of prediction and enable class-balanced pseudo-labeling by positively guiding the adaptation progress and inhibiting potential error accumulation. Extensive experiments on two widely-used synthetic-to-real transfer tasks show that the proposed approach surpasses previous state-of-the-art by up to 5.25% of mIoU with fair model selection criteria.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2023.

Builds on

41 of 59 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
  3. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  4. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,241
  5. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  6. 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 818
  7. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 635
  8. 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
  9. 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
  10. 2020FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 541
  11. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  12. 2019Confidence Regularized Self-Trainingcited by 419
29 more
  1. 2021Deep Long-Tailed Learning: A Surveycited by 417
  2. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 390
  3. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
  4. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 357
  5. 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 309
  6. 2020Unsupervised Intra-domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation through Self-Supervisioncited by 198
  7. 2020PseudoSeg: Designing Pseudo Labels for Semantic Segmentationcited by 180
  8. 2021Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentationcited by 168
  9. 2019A review of domain adaptation without target labelscited by 156
  10. 2021Model Adaptation: Historical Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 152
  11. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  12. 2019Domain Adaptation for Structured Output via Discriminative Patch Representationscited by 150
  13. 2021On Calibration and Out-of-domain Generalizationcited by 134
  14. 2021Soft Calibration Objectives for Neural Networkscited by 92
  15. 2018Visual Domain Adaptation with Manifold Embedded Distribution Alignmentcited by 91
  16. 2021Generalize then Adapt: Source-Free Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 81
  17. 2019Significance-aware Information Bottleneck for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 74
  18. 2022Balancing Discriminability and Transferability for Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 58
  19. 2021Semantics Disentangling for Generalized Zero-Shot Learningcited by 56
  20. 2021DeepGaze IIE: Calibrated prediction in and out-of-domain for state-of-the-art saliency modelingcited by 56
  21. 2022Class-Balanced Pixel-Level Self-Labeling for Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentationcited by 47
  22. 2020Calibrated Prediction with Covariate Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 43
  23. 2021Source-Free Open Compound Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 43
  24. 2021Domain Adaptive Semantic Segmentation without Source Datacited by 30
  25. 2020Rethinking Generative Zero-Shot Learning: An Ensemble Learning Perspective for Recognising Visual Patchescited by 27
  26. 2023Dirichlet-based Uncertainty Calibration for Active Domain Adaptationcited by 24
  27. 2021Fast Batch Nuclear-norm Maximization and Minimization for Robust Domain Adaptationcited by 14
  28. 2021Mitigating Generation Shifts for Generalized Zero-Shot Learningcited by 13
  29. 2022Discovering Domain Disentanglement for Generalized Multi-source Domain Adaptationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

10 papers.