mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Investigating Reinforcement Learning for Communication Strategies in a Task-Initiative Setting

arXiv 2308.01479 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many conversational domains require the system to present nuanced information to users. Such systems must follow up what they say to address clarification questions and repair misunderstandings. In this work, we explore this interactive strategy in a referential communication task. Using simulation, we analyze the communication trade-offs between initial presentation and subsequent followup as a function of user clarification strategy, and compare the performance of several baseline strategies to policies derived by reinforcement learning. We find surprising advantages to coherence-based representations of dialogue strategy, which bring minimal data requirements, explainable choices, and strong audit capabilities, but incur little loss in predicted outcomes across a wide range of user models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2023.

Builds on

6 of 30 references.

References · 6

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  2. 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 760
  3. 2017Colors in Context: A Pragmatic Neural Model for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 57
  4. 2016A User Simulator for Task-Completion Dialoguescited by 56
  5. 2019How to Build User Simulators to Train RL-based Dialog Systemscited by 44
  6. 2020Discourse Coherence, Reference Grounding and Goal Oriented Dialoguecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.