Metrics to Quantify Global Consistency in Synthetic Medical Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image synthesis is increasingly being adopted in medical image processing, for example for data augmentation or inter-modality image translation. In these critical applications, the generated images must fulfill a high standard of biological correctness. A particular requirement for these images is global consistency, i.e an image being overall coherent and structured so that all parts of the image fit together in a realistic and meaningful way. Yet, established image quality metrics do not explicitly quantify this property of synthetic images. In this work, we introduce two metrics that can measure the global consistency of synthetic images on a per-image basis. To measure the global consistency, we presume that a realistic image exhibits consistent properties, e.g., a person's body fat in a whole-body MRI, throughout the depicted object or scene. Hence, we quantify global consistency by predicting and comparing explicit attributes of images on patches using supervised trained neural networks. Next, we adapt this strategy to an unlabeled setting by measuring the similarity of implicit image features predicted by a self-supervised trained network. Our results demonstrate that predicting explicit attributes of synthetic images on patches can distinguish globally consistent from inconsistent images. Implicit representations of images are less sensitive to assess global consistency but are still serviceable when labeled data is unavailable. Compared to established metrics, such as the FID, our method can explicitly measure global consistency on a per-image basis, enabling a dedicated analysis of the biological plausibility of single synthetic images.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2023.
Builds on
24 of 33 references.
References · 24
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
- 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,580
- 2020Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 3,229
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,938
- 2018Demystifying MMD GANscited by 1,268
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 925
- 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
12 more
- 2022StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasetscited by 489
- 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 401
- 2018Image Generation from Scene Graphscited by 324
- 2022Brain Imaging Generation with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 267
- 2019Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and where to find themcited by 161
- 2021Towards Faster and Stabilized GAN Training for High-fidelity Few-shot Image Synthesiscited by 140
- 2021Generative Adversarial Transformerscited by 120
- 2022NUWA-Infinity: Autoregressive over Autoregressive Generation for Infinite Visual Synthesiscited by 71
- 2020Hierarchical Amortized Training for Memory-efficient High Resolution 3D GANcited by 60
- 2020MADGAN: unsupervised Medical Anomaly Detection GAN using multiple adjacent brain MRI slice reconstructioncited by 50
- 2019The Shape of Data: Intrinsic Distance for Data Distributionscited by 38
- 20213D-StyleGAN: A Style-Based Generative Adversarial Network for Generative Modeling of Three-Dimensional Medical Imagescited by 32
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.