mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How Good is Google Bard's Visual Understanding? An Empirical Study on Open Challenges

arXiv 2307.15016 ↗First posted 27 Jul 2023cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Google's Bard has emerged as a formidable competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT in the field of conversational AI. Notably, Bard has recently been updated to handle visual inputs alongside text prompts during conversations. Given Bard's impressive track record in handling textual inputs, we explore its capabilities in understanding and interpreting visual data (images) conditioned by text questions. This exploration holds the potential to unveil new insights and challenges for Bard and other forthcoming multi-modal Generative models, especially in addressing complex computer vision problems that demand accurate visual and language understanding. Specifically, in this study, we focus on 15 diverse task scenarios encompassing regular, camouflaged, medical, under-water and remote sensing data to comprehensively evaluate Bard's performance. Our primary finding indicates that Bard still struggles in these vision scenarios, highlighting the significant gap in vision-based understanding that needs to be bridged in future developments. We expect that this empirical study will prove valuable in advancing future models, leading to enhanced capabilities in comprehending and interpreting fine-grained visual data. Our project is released on https://github.com/htqin/GoogleBard-VisUnderstand

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

References · 14

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
  6. 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
  7. 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
  8. 2021Concealed Object Detectioncited by 212
  9. 2020RSVQA: Visual Question Answering for Remote Sensing Datacited by 197
  10. 2019Single Image Deraining: A Comprehensive Benchmark Analysiscited by 84
  11. 2022Video Polyp Segmentation: A Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 81
  12. 2023Advances in Deep Concealed Scene Understandingcited by 47
2 more
  1. 2020Visual Sentiment Analysis from Disaster Images in Social Mediacited by 14
  2. 2023RGB-D Indiscernible Object Counting in Underwater Scenescited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.

9 papers.