How Good is Google Bard's Visual Understanding? An Empirical Study on Open Challenges
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Google's Bard has emerged as a formidable competitor to OpenAI's ChatGPT in the field of conversational AI. Notably, Bard has recently been updated to handle visual inputs alongside text prompts during conversations. Given Bard's impressive track record in handling textual inputs, we explore its capabilities in understanding and interpreting visual data (images) conditioned by text questions. This exploration holds the potential to unveil new insights and challenges for Bard and other forthcoming multi-modal Generative models, especially in addressing complex computer vision problems that demand accurate visual and language understanding. Specifically, in this study, we focus on 15 diverse task scenarios encompassing regular, camouflaged, medical, under-water and remote sensing data to comprehensively evaluate Bard's performance. Our primary finding indicates that Bard still struggles in these vision scenarios, highlighting the significant gap in vision-based understanding that needs to be bridged in future developments. We expect that this empirical study will prove valuable in advancing future models, leading to enhanced capabilities in comprehending and interpreting fine-grained visual data. Our project is released on https://github.com/htqin/GoogleBard-VisUnderstand
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jul 2023.
Builds on
14 of 23 references.
References · 14
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,701
- 2019Towards VQA Models That Can Readcited by 1,696
- 2022LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applicationscited by 1,218
- 2021Concealed Object Detectioncited by 212
- 2020RSVQA: Visual Question Answering for Remote Sensing Datacited by 197
- 2019Single Image Deraining: A Comprehensive Benchmark Analysiscited by 84
- 2022Video Polyp Segmentation: A Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 81
- 2023Advances in Deep Concealed Scene Understandingcited by 47
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 3.
9 papers.
- 2024Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoningcited by 50
- 2025Superposition Yields Robust Neural Scalingcited by 30
- 2024Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 29
- 2023GlitchBench: Can large multimodal models detect video game glitches?cited by 21
- 2025FOCUS: First Order Concentrated Updating Schemecited by 7
- 2024Give me a hint: Can LLMs take a hint to solve math problems?cited by 6
- 2023Multimodal Analysis Of Google Bard And GPT-Vision: Experiments In Visual Reasoningcited by 0
- 2024Patch is Enough: Naturalistic Adversarial Patch against Vision-Language Pre-training Modelscited by 0
- 2025VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systemscited by 0
- 2025VERITAS: Verification and Explanation of Realness in Images for Transparency in AI Systems7 Jul 2025
- 2025Superposition Yields Robust Neural Scaling15 May 2025
- 2025FOCUS: First Order Concentrated Updating Scheme21 Jan 2025
- 2024Critic-V: VLM Critics Help Catch VLM Errors in Multimodal Reasoning27 Nov 2024
- 2024Give me a hint: Can LLMs take a hint to solve math problems?8 Oct 2024
- 2024Patch is Enough: Naturalistic Adversarial Patch against Vision-Language Pre-training Models7 Oct 2024
- 2024Effectiveness Assessment of Recent Large Vision-Language Models7 Mar 2024
- 2023GlitchBench: Can large multimodal models detect video game glitches?8 Dec 2023
- 2023Multimodal Analysis Of Google Bard And GPT-Vision: Experiments In Visual Reasoning17 Aug 2023