A Distribution-Dependent Analysis of Meta-Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A key problem in the theory of meta-learning is to understand how the task distributions influence transfer risk, the expected error of a meta-learner on a new task drawn from the unknown task distribution. In this paper, focusing on fixed design linear regression with Gaussian noise and a Gaussian task (or parameter) distribution, we give distribution-dependent lower bounds on the transfer risk of any algorithm, while we also show that a novel, weighted version of the so-called biased regularized regression method is able to match these lower bounds up to a fixed constant factor. Notably, the weighting is derived from the covariance of the Gaussian task distribution. Altogether, our results provide a precise characterization of the difficulty of meta-learning in this Gaussian setting. While this problem setting may appear simple, we show that it is rich enough to unify the "parameter sharing" and "representation learning" streams of meta-learning; in particular, representation learning is obtained as the special case when the covariance matrix of the task distribution is unknown. For this case we propose to adopt the EM method, which is shown to enjoy efficient updates in our case. The paper is completed by an empirical study of EM. In particular, our experimental results show that the EM algorithm can attain the lower bound as the number of tasks grows, while the algorithm is also successful in competing with its alternatives when used in a representation learning context.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023Convergence of First-Order Algorithms for Meta-Learning with Moreau Envelopescited by 8
- 2023Nonlinear Meta-Learning Can Guarantee Faster Ratescited by 8
- 2022Meta Learning MDPs with Linear Transition Modelscited by 4
- 2023On the Generalization Error of Meta Learning for the Gibbs Algorithmcited by 2
- 2024On the ERM Principle in Meta-Learningcited by 1
- 2025Mixed-Sample SGD: an End-to-end Analysis of Supervised Transfer Learningcited by 0
- 2025Mixed-Sample SGD: an End-to-end Analysis of Supervised Transfer Learning6 Jul 2025
- 2024On the ERM Principle in Meta-Learning26 Nov 2024
- 2023Nonlinear Meta-Learning Can Guarantee Faster Rates20 Jul 2023
- 2023On the Generalization Error of Meta Learning for the Gibbs Algorithm27 Apr 2023
- 2023Convergence of First-Order Algorithms for Meta-Learning with Moreau Envelopes17 Jan 2023
- 2022Meta Learning MDPs with Linear Transition Models21 Jan 2022