mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Eliminating Label Leakage in Tree-Based Vertical Federated Learning

arXiv 2307.10318 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Vertical federated learning (VFL) enables multiple parties with disjoint features of a common user set to train a machine learning model without sharing their private data. Tree-based models have become prevalent in VFL due to their interpretability and efficiency. However, the vulnerability of tree-based VFL has not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, we first introduce a novel label inference attack, ID2Graph, which utilizes the sets of record IDs assigned to each node (i.e., instance space)to deduce private training labels. ID2Graph attack generates a graph structure from training samples, extracts communities from the graph, and clusters the local dataset using community information. To counteract label leakage from the instance space, we propose two effective defense mechanisms, Grafting-LDP, which improves the utility of label differential privacy with post-processing, and andID-LMID, which focuses on mutual information regularization. Comprehensive experiments on various datasets reveal that ID2Graph presents significant risks to tree-based models such as RandomForest and XGBoost. Further evaluations of these benchmarks demonstrate that our defense methods effectively mitigate label leakage in such instances

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.

Builds on

25 of 70 references.

References · 25

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  3. 2019SecureBoost: A Lossless Federated Learning Frameworkcited by 174
  4. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 139
  5. 2021Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacycited by 113
  6. 2020Privacy Preserving Vertical Federated Learning for Tree-based Modelscited by 89
  7. 2021Label Leakage and Protection in Two-party Split Learningcited by 87
  8. 2014Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacycited by 62
  9. 2019Federated Forestcited by 49
  10. 2020Improving Robustness to Model Inversion Attacks via Mutual Information Regularizationcited by 49
  11. 2016Differential Privacy as a Mutual Information Constraintcited by 41
  12. 2023A Survey on Vertical Federated Learning: From a Layered Perspectivecited by 30
13 more
  1. 2020FederBoost: Private Federated Learning for GBDTcited by 27
  2. 2020Large-Scale Secure XGB for Vertical Federated Learningcited by 26
  3. 2022Label Leakage and Protection from Forward Embedding in Vertical Federated Learningcited by 26
  4. 2019A Communication Efficient Collaborative Learning Framework for Distributed Featurescited by 21
  5. 2021User-Level Label Leakage from Gradients in Federated Learningcited by 21
  6. 2020A Vertical Federated Learning Method for Interpretable Scorecard and Its Application in Credit Scoringcited by 16
  7. 2022OpBoost: A Vertical Federated Tree Boosting Framework Based on Order-Preserving Desensitizationcited by 12
  8. 2020Modelling and Quantifying Membership Information Leakage in Machine Learningcited by 11
  9. 2022Residue-based Label Protection Mechanisms in Vertical Logistic Regressioncited by 10
  10. 2021PIVODL: Privacy-preserving vertical federated learning over distributed labelscited by 9
  11. 2021Enabling SQL-based Training Data Debugging for Federated Learningcited by 8
  12. 2022An Efficient and Robust System for Vertically Federated Random Forestcited by 6
  13. 2021Privacy-Preserving Training of Tree Ensembles over Continuous Datacited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

6 papers.