mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpreting and generalizing deep learning in physics-based problems with functional linear models

arXiv 2307.04569 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2023cs.LG physics.flu-dyncited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although deep learning has achieved remarkable success in various scientific machine learning applications, its opaque nature poses concerns regarding interpretability and generalization capabilities beyond the training data. Interpretability is crucial and often desired in modeling physical systems. Moreover, acquiring extensive datasets that encompass the entire range of input features is challenging in many physics-based learning tasks, leading to increased errors when encountering out-of-distribution (OOD) data. In this work, motivated by the field of functional data analysis (FDA), we propose generalized functional linear models as an interpretable surrogate for a trained deep learning model. We demonstrate that our model could be trained either based on a trained neural network (post-hoc interpretation) or directly from training data (interpretable operator learning). A library of generalized functional linear models with different kernel functions is considered and sparse regression is used to discover an interpretable surrogate model that could be analytically presented. We present test cases in solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, and transport. Our results demonstrate that our model can achieve comparable accuracy to deep learning and can improve OOD generalization while providing more transparency and interpretability. Our study underscores the significance of interpretable representation in scientific machine learning and showcases the potential of functional linear models as a tool for interpreting and generalizing deep learning.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2023.

Builds on

33 of 100 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  4. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  5. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 318
  6. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  7. 2017Learning Koopman Invariant Subspaces for Dynamic Mode Decompositioncited by 156
  8. 2019Lift & Learn: Physics-informed machine learning for large-scale nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 96
  9. 2021Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methodscited by 83
  10. 2019LassoNet: A Neural Network with Feature Sparsitycited by 81
  11. 2022Reliable extrapolation of deep neural operators informed by physics or sparse observationscited by 62
  12. 2020DeepGreen: Deep Learning of Green's Functions for Nonlinear Boundary Value Problemscited by 61
21 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive lawscited by 51
  2. 2020Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantitiescited by 46
  3. 2021Data-driven discovery of Green's functions with human-understandable deep learningcited by 43
  4. 2021Simulating progressive intramural damage leading to aortic dissection using an operator-regression neural networkcited by 35
  5. 2013Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decompositioncited by 30
  6. 2023Super-Resolution Analysis via Machine Learning: A Survey for Fluid Flowscited by 30
  7. 2020On transfer learning of neural networks using bi-fidelity data for uncertainty propagationcited by 26
  8. 2022Sparse Neural Additive Model: Interpretable Deep Learning with Feature Selection via Group Sparsitycited by 25
  9. 2022Learning Green's functions associated with time-dependent partial differential equationscited by 25
  10. 2021Designing Inherently Interpretable Machine Learning Modelscited by 23
  11. 2019Quantifying Model Complexity via Functional Decomposition for Better Post-Hoc Interpretabilitycited by 22
  12. 2021Kernel Learning for Robust Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Linear and Nonlinear Disambiguation Optimization (LANDO)cited by 22
  13. 2022A Physics-Guided Neural Operator Learning Approach to Model Biological Tissues from Digital Image Correlation Measurementscited by 19
  14. 2023Deep neural operators can serve as accurate surrogates for shape optimization: A case study for airfoilscited by 19
  15. 2021Neural Network Training Using ℓ1-Regularization and Bi-fidelity Datacited by 16
  16. 2022Towards out of distribution generalization for problems in mechanicscited by 11
  17. 2022Interpretable models for extrapolation in scientific machine learningcited by 11
  18. 2023Forecasting subcritical cylinder wakes with Fourier Neural Operatorscited by 11
  19. 2020Neural Vortex Method: from Finite Lagrangian Particles to Infinite Dimensional Eulerian Dynamicscited by 6
  20. 2022An Introduction to Kernel and Operator Learning Methods for Homogenization by Self-consistent Clustering Analysiscited by 6
  21. 2023Genetic Programming Based Symbolic Regression for Analytical Solutions to Differential Equationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

9 papers.