mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Designing Inherently Interpretable Machine Learning Models

arXiv 2111.01743 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interpretable machine learning (IML) becomes increasingly important in highly regulated industry sectors related to the health and safety or fundamental rights of human beings. In general, the inherently IML models should be adopted because of their transparency and explainability, while black-box models with model-agnostic explainability can be more difficult to defend under regulatory scrutiny. For assessing inherent interpretability of a machine learning model, we propose a qualitative template based on feature effects and model architecture constraints. It provides the design principles for high-performance IML model development, with examples given by reviewing our recent works on ExNN, GAMI-Net, SIMTree, and the Aletheia toolkit for local linear interpretability of deep ReLU networks. We further demonstrate how to design an interpretable ReLU DNN model with evaluation of conceptual soundness for a real case study of predicting credit default in home lending. We hope that this work will provide a practical guide of developing inherently IML models in high risk applications in banking industry, as well as other sectors.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.

Builds on

8 of 17 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  4. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 305
  5. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
  6. 2020GAMI-Net: An Explainable Neural Network based on Generalized Additive Models with Structured Interactionscited by 82
  7. 2020Unwrapping The Black Box of Deep ReLU Networks: Interpretability, Diagnostics, and Simplificationcited by 32
  8. 2019Enhancing Explainability of Neural Networks through Architecture Constraintscited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 12; 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Explainable, Interpretable & Trustworthy AI for Intelligent Digital Twin: Case Study on Remaining Useful Lifecited by 19
  2. 2022Monotonic Neural Additive Models: Pursuing Regulated Machine Learning Models for Credit Scoringcited by 12
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Review on Financial Explainable AIcited by 10
  4. 2023Interpreting and generalizing deep learning in physics-based problems with functional linear modelscited by 9
  5. 2023PiML Toolbox for Interpretable Machine Learning Model Development and Diagnosticscited by 4
  6. 2023Interpretable Machine Learning based on Functional ANOVA Framework: Algorithms and Comparisonscited by 4
  7. 2024Space-scale Exploration of the Poor Reliability of Deep Learning Models: the Case of the Remote Sensing of Rooftop Photovoltaic Systemscited by 4
  8. 2023On marginal feature attributions of tree-based modelscited by 3
  9. 2023Semantics, Ontology and Explanationcited by 2
  10. 2024Explainable Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Surveycited by 2
  11. 2024Less Discriminatory Alternative and Interpretable XGBoost Framework for Binary Classificationcited by 2
  12. 2024Inherently Interpretable Tree Ensemble Learningcited by 2
11 more
  1. 2022Interpretable (not just posthoc-explainable) medical claims modeling for discharge placement to prevent avoidable all-cause readmissions or deathcited by 1
  2. 2023Interpretable (not just posthoc-explainable) heterogeneous survivor bias-corrected treatment effects for assignment of postdischarge interventions to prevent readmissionscited by 1
  3. 2023Wrapper Boxes: Faithful Attribution of Model Predictions to Training Datacited by 1
  4. 2024Are Logistic Models Really Interpretable?cited by 1
  5. 2024CHILLI: A data context-aware perturbation method for XAIcited by 1
  6. 2022Autoencoded sparse Bayesian in-IRT factorization, calibration, and amortized inference for the Work Disability Functional Assessment Batterycited by 0
  7. 2023A Comparison of Modeling Preprocessing Techniquescited by 0
  8. 2023Sound Explanation for Trustworthy Machine Learningcited by 0
  9. 2023Opening the Black Box: Towards inherently interpretable energy data imputation models using building physics insightcited by 0
  10. 2025Explainable post-training bias mitigation with distribution-based fairness metricscited by 0
  11. 2026Sparse POD Mode Selection and Manifold Dimensionality Reduction with Neural Networkscited by 0