mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Additive-feature-attribution methods: a review on explainable artificial intelligence for fluid dynamics and heat transfer

arXiv 2409.11992 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2024physics.flu-dyn cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of data-driven methods in fluid mechanics has surged dramatically in recent years due to their capacity to adapt to the complex and multi-scale nature of turbulent flows, as well as to detect patterns in large-scale simulations or experimental tests. In order to interpret the relationships generated in the models during the training process, numerical attributions need to be assigned to the input features. One important example are the additive-feature-attribution methods. These explainability methods link the input features with the model prediction, providing an interpretation based on a linear formulation of the models. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP values) are formulated as the only possible interpretation that offers a unique solution for understanding the model. In this manuscript, the additive-feature-attribution methods are presented, showing four common implementations in the literature: kernel SHAP, tree SHAP, gradient SHAP, and deep SHAP. Then, the main applications of the additive-feature-attribution methods are introduced, dividing them into three main groups: turbulence modeling, fluid-mechanics fundamentals, and applied problems in fluid dynamics and heat transfer. This review shows thatexplainability techniques, and in particular additive-feature-attribution methods, are crucial for implementing interpretable and physics-compliant deep-learning models in the fluid-mechanics field.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 215 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2024.

Builds on

23 of 215 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2021Machine learning accelerated computational fluid dynamicscited by 461
  8. 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 295
  9. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  10. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
  11. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  12. 2020Improving KernelSHAP: Practical Shapley Value Estimation via Linear Regressioncited by 153
11 more
  1. 2021Enhancing Computational Fluid Dynamics with Machine Learningcited by 137
  2. 2020Benchmarking Deep Learning Interpretability in Time Series Predictionscited by 102
  3. 2018Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Papercited by 48
  4. 2020Convolutional-network models to predict wall-bounded turbulence from wall quantitiescited by 46
  5. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Data-Driven Turbulence Modelscited by 35
  6. 2023The transformative potential of machine learning for experiments in fluid mechanicscited by 26
  7. 2021Interpretable deep-learning models to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 18
  8. 2023Identifying regions of importance in wall-bounded turbulence through explainable deep learningcited by 15
  9. 2021Applying Machine Learning to Study Fluid Mechanicscited by 13
  10. 2023Interpreting and generalizing deep learning in physics-based problems with functional linear modelscited by 9
  11. 2022Machine learning based surrogate models for microchannel heat sink optimizationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.