Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Unlocking the Potential of Large Language Models for AI-Assisted Medical Education
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Artificial intelligence is gaining traction in more ways than ever before. The popularity of language models and AI-based businesses has soared since ChatGPT was made available to the general public via OpenAI. It is becoming increasingly common for people to use ChatGPT both professionally and personally. Considering the widespread use of ChatGPT and the reliance people place on it, this study determined how reliable ChatGPT can be for answering complex medical and clinical questions. Harvard University gross anatomy along with the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) questionnaire were used to accomplish the objective. The paper evaluated the obtained results using a 2-way ANOVA and posthoc analysis. Both showed systematic covariation between format and prompt. Furthermore, the physician adjudicators independently rated the outcome's accuracy, concordance, and insight. As a result of the analysis, ChatGPT-generated answers were found to be more context-oriented and represented a better model for deductive reasoning than regular Google search results. Furthermore, ChatGPT obtained 58.8% on logical questions and 60% on ethical questions. This means that the ChatGPT is approaching the passing range for logical questions and has crossed the threshold for ethical questions. The paper believes ChatGPT and other language learning models can be invaluable tools for e-learners; however, the study suggests that there is still room to improve their accuracy. In order to improve ChatGPT's performance in the future, further research is needed to better understand how it can answer different types of questions.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2023.
Builds on
5 of 21 references.
References · 5
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
- 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168
- 2022ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?cited by 88
- 2023One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Eracited by 55
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 4.
10 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 202
- 2023User Modeling in the Era of Large Language Models: Current Research and Future Directionscited by 18
- 2024ChIRAAG: ChatGPT Informed Rapid and Automated Assertion Generationcited by 16
- 2024TCMD: A Traditional Chinese Medicine QA Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2024Mitigating Hallucinations of Large Language Models in Medical Information Extraction via Contrastive Decodingcited by 5
- 2024When Geoscience Meets Generative AI and Large Language Models: Foundations, Trends, and Future Challengescited by 4
- 2023Justifiable Artificial Intelligence: Engineering Large Language Models for Legal Applicationscited by 2
- 2023Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Reviewcited by 1
- 2023Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Reviewcited by 1
- 2024Mitigating Hallucinations of Large Language Models in Medical Information Extraction via Contrastive Decoding21 Oct 2024
- 2024TCMD: A Traditional Chinese Medicine QA Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models7 Jun 2024
- 2024ChIRAAG: ChatGPT Informed Rapid and Automated Assertion Generation31 Jan 2024
- 2024When Geoscience Meets Generative AI and Large Language Models: Foundations, Trends, and Future Challenges25 Jan 2024
- 2023User Modeling in the Era of Large Language Models: Current Research and Future Directions11 Dec 2023
- 2023Justifiable Artificial Intelligence: Engineering Large Language Models for Legal Applications27 Nov 2023
- 2023Potential Societal Biases of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review24 Nov 2023
- 2023Ethical Implications of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Scoping Review24 Nov 2023
- 2023Evaluating Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey30 Oct 2023
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models6 Jul 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT Family of Models for Biomedical Reasoning and Classification
- 2023The Potential and Pitfalls of using a Large Language Model such as ChatGPT or GPT-4 as a Clinical Assistant
- 2025Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questions
- 2023A Systematic Study and Comprehensive Evaluation of ChatGPT on Benchmark Datasets
- 2023Does Synthetic Data Generation of LLMs Help Clinical Text Mining?
- 2022Can large language models reason about medical questions?
- 2023Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models
- 2023Translating Radiology Reports into Plain Language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with Prompt Learning: Promising Results, Limitations, and Potential