mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Assessment of Tutoring Practices using Retrieval-Augmented Generation

arXiv 2402.14594 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One-on-one tutoring is an effective instructional method for enhancing learning, yet its efficacy hinges on tutor competencies. Novice math tutors often prioritize content-specific guidance, neglecting aspects such as social-emotional learning. Social-emotional learning promotes equity and inclusion and nurturing relationships with students, which is crucial for holistic student development. Assessing the competencies of tutors accurately and efficiently can drive the development of tailored tutor training programs. However, evaluating novice tutor ability during real-time tutoring remains challenging as it typically requires experts-in-the-loop. To address this challenge, this preliminary study aims to harness Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT), such as GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models, to automatically assess tutors' ability of using social-emotional tutoring strategies. Moreover, this study also reports on the financial dimensions and considerations of employing these models in real-time and at scale for automated assessment. The current study examined four prompting strategies: two basic Zero-shot prompt strategies, Tree of Thought prompt, and Retrieval-Augmented Generator (RAG) based prompt. The results indicate that the RAG prompt demonstrated more accurate performance (assessed by the level of hallucination and correctness in the generated assessment texts) and lower financial costs than the other strategies evaluated. These findings inform the development of personalized tutor training interventions to enhance the the educational effectiveness of tutored learning.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2024.

Builds on

5 of 17 references.

References · 5

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2023Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Modelscited by 3,211
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  4. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instructioncited by 37
  5. 2023Using Large Language Models to Provide Explanatory Feedback to Human Tutorscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Enhancing tutoring systems by leveraging tailored promptings and domain knowledge with Large Language Models
  2. 2025Automatic Large Language Models Creation of Interactive Learning Lessons
  3. 2023Retrieval-augmented Generation to Improve Math Question-Answering: Trade-offs Between Groundedness and Human Preference
  4. 2024Evaluating the Impact of Advanced LLM Techniques on AI-Lecture Tutors for a Robotics Course
  5. 2026Regulating the AI Tutor: Intentions, Help-Seeking, and Self-Regulated Learning in Adolescent GenAI Use ↗
  6. 2025Personalized Education with Generative AI and Digital Twins: VR, RAG, and Zero-Shot Sentiment Analysis for Industry 4.0 Workforce Development
  7. 2024A Systematic Review on Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models for K-12 STEM Education
  8. 2026An LLM -Powered Assessment Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) For Higher Education