mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Contrastive Multi-view Framework for Customer Lifetime Value Prediction

arXiv 2306.14400 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2023cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate customer lifetime value (LTV) prediction can help service providers optimize their marketing policies in customer-centric applications. However, the heavy sparsity of consumption events and the interference of data variance and noise obstruct LTV estimation. Many existing LTV prediction methods directly train a single-view LTV predictor on consumption samples, which may yield inaccurate and even biased knowledge extraction. In this paper, we propose a contrastive multi-view framework for LTV prediction, which is a plug-and-play solution compatible with various backbone models. It synthesizes multiple heterogeneous LTV regressors with complementary knowledge to improve model robustness and captures sample relatedness via contrastive learning to mitigate the dependency on data abundance. Concretely, we use a decomposed scheme that converts the LTV prediction problem into a combination of estimating consumption probability and payment amount. To alleviate the impact of noisy data on model learning, we propose a multi-view framework that jointly optimizes multiple types of regressors with diverse characteristics and advantages to encode and fuse comprehensive knowledge. To fully exploit the potential of limited training samples, we propose a hybrid contrastive learning method to help capture the relatedness between samples in both classification and regression tasks. We conduct extensive experiments on a real-world game LTV prediction dataset and the results validate the effectiveness of our method. We have deployed our solution online in Huawei's mobile game center and achieved 32.26% of total payment amount gains.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2023.

Builds on

19 of 53 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  4. 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 676
  5. 2017Deep & Cross Network for Ad Click Predictionscited by 393
  6. 2020DCN V2: Improved Deep & Cross Network and Practical Lessons for Web-scale Learning to Rank Systemscited by 327
  7. 2021Are Graph Augmentations Necessary? Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendationcited by 173
  8. 2021Contrastive Learning for Cold-Start Recommendationcited by 79
  9. 2019NPA: Neural News Recommendation with Personalized Attentioncited by 73
  10. 2022Billion-user Customer Lifetime Value Prediction: An Industrial-scale Solution from Kuaishoucited by 17
  11. 2017Customer Lifetime Value Prediction Using Embeddingscited by 16
  12. 2018Customer Lifetime Value in Video Games Using Deep Learning and Parametric Modelscited by 14
7 more
  1. 2022CL4CTR: A Contrastive Learning Framework for CTR Predictioncited by 14
  2. 2021Click-through Rate Prediction with Auto-Quantized Contrastive Learningcited by 7
  3. 2022Personalized Promotion Decision Making Based on Direct and Enduring Effect Predictionscited by 4
  4. 2015Autonomous CRM Control via CLV Approximation with Deep Reinforcement Learning in Discrete and Continuous Action Spacecited by 2
  5. 2019Profiling Players with Engagement Predictionscited by 2
  6. 2021Predicting Customer Lifetime Values -- ecommerce use casecited by 1
  7. 2022Predicting Customer Lifetime Value in Free-to-Play Gamescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.