mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature Interactions Reveal Linguistic Structure in Language Models

arXiv 2306.12181 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study feature interactions in the context of feature attribution methods for post-hoc interpretability. In interpretability research, getting to grips with feature interactions is increasingly recognised as an important challenge, because interacting features are key to the success of neural networks. Feature interactions allow a model to build up hierarchical representations for its input, and might provide an ideal starting point for the investigation into linguistic structure in language models. However, uncovering the exact role that these interactions play is also difficult, and a diverse range of interaction attribution methods has been proposed. In this paper, we focus on the question which of these methods most faithfully reflects the inner workings of the target models. We work out a grey box methodology, in which we train models to perfection on a formal language classification task, using PCFGs. We show that under specific configurations, some methods are indeed able to uncover the grammatical rules acquired by a model. Based on these findings we extend our evaluation to a case study on language models, providing novel insights into the linguistic structure that these models have acquired.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

Builds on

46 of 66 references.

References · 46

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  6. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  7. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  8. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  9. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 958
  10. 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 530
  11. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  12. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
34 more
  1. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 285
  2. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  3. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 208
  4. 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 167
  5. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 160
  6. 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
  7. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
  8. 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
  9. 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
  10. 2020Learning to Faithfully Rationalize by Constructioncited by 113
  11. 2020Explaining Explanations: Axiomatic Feature Interactions for Deep Networkscited by 103
  12. 2022Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanationscited by 92
  13. 2017Detecting Statistical Interactions from Neural Network Weightscited by 80
  14. 2020Aligning Faithful Interpretations with their Social Attributioncited by 79
  15. 2020How does this interaction affect me? Interpretable attribution for feature interactionscited by 73
  16. 2018Beyond Word Importance: Contextual Decomposition to Extract Interactions from LSTMscited by 67
  17. 2018Hierarchical interpretations for neural network predictionscited by 66
  18. 2021"Will You Find These Shortcuts?" A Protocol for Evaluating the Faithfulness of Input Salience Methods for Text Classificationcited by 66
  19. 2022Measuring the Mixing of Contextual Information in the Transformercited by 65
  20. 2020RNNs can generate bounded hierarchical languages with optimal memorycited by 59
  21. 2022Post hoc Explanations may be Ineffective for Detecting Unknown Spurious Correlationcited by 59
  22. 2020Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification via Feature Interaction Detectioncited by 57
  23. 2020How Can Self-Attention Networks Recognize Dyck-n Languages?cited by 51
  24. 2020Interpretation of NLP models through input marginalizationcited by 44
  25. 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
  26. 2019Memory-Augmented Recurrent Neural Networks Can Learn Generalized Dyck Languagescited by 31
  27. 2019Towards Hierarchical Importance Attribution: Explaining Compositional Semantics for Neural Sequence Modelscited by 26
  28. 2018Evaluating the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Context-Free Grammarscited by 16
  29. 2022A Song of (Dis)agreement: Evaluating the Evaluation of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Natural Language Processingcited by 13
  30. 2020LSTMs Compose (and Learn) Bottom-Upcited by 11
  31. 2018Can I trust you more? Model-Agnostic Hierarchical Explanationscited by 10
  32. 2022Does Self-Rationalization Improve Robustness to Spurious Correlations?cited by 9
  33. 2020Evaluating Attribution Methods using White-Box LSTMscited by 8
  34. 2023The Weighted M"obius Score: A Unified Framework for Feature Attributioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

8 papers.