mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using Shapley interactions to understand how models use structure

arXiv 2403.13106 ↗First posted 19 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Language is an intricately structured system, and a key goal of NLP interpretability is to provide methodological insights for understanding how language models represent this structure internally. In this paper, we use Shapley Taylor interaction indices (STII) in order to examine how language and speech models internally relate and structure their inputs. Pairwise Shapley interactions measure how much two inputs work together to influence model outputs beyond if we linearly added their independent influences, providing a view into how models encode structural interactions between inputs. We relate the interaction patterns in models to three underlying linguistic structures: syntactic structure, non-compositional semantics, and phonetic coarticulation. We find that autoregressive text models encode interactions that correlate with the syntactic proximity of inputs, and that both autoregressive and masked models encode nonlinear interactions in idiomatic phrases with non-compositional semantics. Our speech results show that inputs are more entangled for pairs where a neighboring consonant is likely to influence a vowel or approximant, showing that models encode the phonetic interaction needed for extracting discrete phonemic representations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.

Builds on

29 of 50 references.

References · 29

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
  5. 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,358
  6. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  7. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  8. 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 401
  9. 2019On Completeness-aware Concept-Based Explanations in Deep Neural Networkscited by 239
  10. 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 230
  11. 2022Transformer Language Models without Positional Encodings Still Learn Positional Informationcited by 148
  12. 2019The Shapley Taylor Interaction Indexcited by 143
17 more
  1. 2018Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Contextcited by 113
  2. 2021Sampling Permutations for Shapley Value Estimationcited by 101
  3. 2022Faith-Shap: The Faithful Shapley Interaction Indexcited by 68
  4. 2018Hierarchical interpretations for neural network predictionscited by 66
  5. 2023What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?cited by 62
  6. 2021Conditional probing: measuring usable information beyond a baselinecited by 61
  7. 2020Generating Hierarchical Explanations on Text Classification via Feature Interaction Detectioncited by 57
  8. 2023SHAP-IQ: Unified Approximation of any-order Shapley Interactionscited by 50
  9. 2024Language models align with human judgments on key grammatical constructionscited by 49
  10. 2024CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic taskscited by 45
  11. 2022Characterizing Intrinsic Compositionality in Transformers with Tree Projectionscited by 40
  12. 2021Attention Flows are Shapley Value Explanationscited by 30
  13. 2021A Bayesian Framework for Information-Theoretic Probingcited by 22
  14. 2020Analyzing analytical methods: The case of phonology in neural models of spoken languagecited by 16
  15. 2020LSTMs Compose (and Learn) Bottom-Upcited by 11
  16. 2023Feature Interactions Reveal Linguistic Structure in Language Modelscited by 8
  17. 2022Visualizing Automatic Speech Recognition -- Means for a Better Understanding?cited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.