Adaptive Ensemble Q-learning: Minimizing Estimation Bias via Error Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The ensemble method is a promising way to mitigate the overestimation issue in Q-learning, where multiple function approximators are used to estimate the action values. It is known that the estimation bias hinges heavily on the ensemble size (i.e., the number of Q-function approximators used in the target), and that determining the `right' ensemble size is highly nontrivial, because of the time-varying nature of the function approximation errors during the learning process. To tackle this challenge, we first derive an upper bound and a lower bound on the estimation bias, based on which the ensemble size is adapted to drive the bias to be nearly zero, thereby coping with the impact of the time-varying approximation errors accordingly. Motivated by the theoretic findings, we advocate that the ensemble method can be combined with Model Identification Adaptive Control (MIAC) for effective ensemble size adaptation. Specifically, we devise Adaptive Ensemble Q-learning (AdaEQ), a generalized ensemble method with two key steps: (a) approximation error characterization which serves as the feedback for flexibly controlling the ensemble size, and (b) ensemble size adaptation tailored towards minimizing the estimation bias. Extensive experiments are carried out to show that AdaEQ can improve the learning performance than the existing methods for the MuJoCo benchmark.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2023.
Builds on
19 of 53 references.
References · 19
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,417
- 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,241
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 840
- 2019When to Trust Your Model: Model-Based Policy Optimizationcited by 773
- 2021Randomized Ensembled Double Q-Learning: Learning Fast Without a Modelcited by 288
- 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 213
- 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning and the Deadly Triadcited by 174
- 2020SUNRISE: A Simple Unified Framework for Ensemble Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 152
- 2019Planning with Goal-Conditioned Policiescited by 149
7 more
- 2020Maxmin Q-learning: Controlling the Estimation Bias of Q-learningcited by 117
- 2016Averaged-DQN: Variance Reduction and Stabilization for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 106
- 2016Why Deep Neural Networks for Function Approximation?cited by 82
- 2021On the Importance of Hyperparameter Optimization for Model-based Reinforcement Learningcited by 59
- 2021Ensemble Bootstrapping for Q-Learningcited by 31
- 2020Self-correcting Q-Learningcited by 9
- 2020On the Power of Randomization for Scheduling Real-Time Traffic in Wireless Networkscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Policies for Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 9
- 2024REValueD: Regularised Ensemble Value-Decomposition for Factorisable Markov Decision Processescited by 6
- 2024Kaleidoscope: Learnable Masks for Heterogeneous Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 6
- 2024Stochastic Q-learning for Large Discrete Action Spacescited by 5
- 2024Contextualized Hybrid Ensemble Q-learning: Learning Fast with Control Priorscited by 5
- 2025Scaling DRL for Decision Making: A Survey on Data, Network, and Training Budget Strategiescited by 1
- 2026Controlling Underestimation Bias in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe Explorationcited by 1
- 2024Social Interpretable Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026Revisiting Overestimation Bias Problem of Q-learning: Settling Large Discrete Action Space via Action Intersectioncited by 0
- 2026Revisiting Overestimation Bias Problem of Q-learning: Settling Large Discrete Action Space via Action Intersection13 Aug 2026
- 2026Controlling Underestimation Bias in Constrained Reinforcement Learning for Safe Exploration17 Jan 2026
- 2025Reinforcement Fine-Tuning of Flow-Matching Policies for Vision-Language-Action Models11 Oct 2025
- 2025Scaling DRL for Decision Making: A Survey on Data, Network, and Training Budget Strategies5 Aug 2025
- 2024Kaleidoscope: Learnable Masks for Heterogeneous Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning11 Oct 2024
- 2024Contextualized Hybrid Ensemble Q-learning: Learning Fast with Control Priors28 Jun 2024
- 2024Stochastic Q-learning for Large Discrete Action Spaces16 May 2024
- 2024Social Interpretable Reinforcement Learning27 Jan 2024
- 2024REValueD: Regularised Ensemble Value-Decomposition for Factorisable Markov Decision Processes16 Jan 2024