mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TopP&R: Robust Support Estimation Approach for Evaluating Fidelity and Diversity in Generative Models

arXiv 2306.08013 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a robust and reliable evaluation metric for generative models by introducing topological and statistical treatments for rigorous support estimation. Existing metrics, such as Inception Score (IS), Frechet Inception Distance (FID), and the variants of Precision and Recall (P&R), heavily rely on supports that are estimated from sample features. However, the reliability of their estimation has not been seriously discussed (and overlooked) even though the quality of the evaluation entirely depends on it. In this paper, we propose Topological Precision and Recall (TopP&R, pronounced 'topper'), which provides a systematic approach to estimating supports, retaining only topologically and statistically important features with a certain level of confidence. This not only makes TopP&R strong for noisy features, but also provides statistical consistency. Our theoretical and experimental results show that TopP&R is robust to outliers and non-independent and identically distributed (Non-IID) perturbations, while accurately capturing the true trend of change in samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evaluation metric focused on the robust estimation of the support and provides its statistical consistency under noise.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

Builds on

26 of 51 references.

References · 26

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  4. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  5. 2019Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGANcited by 3,588
  6. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  7. 2018Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesiscited by 2,626
  8. 2021Alias-Free Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,184
  9. 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
  10. 2022StyleGAN-XL: Scaling StyleGAN to Large Diverse Datasetscited by 492
  11. 2020Reliable Fidelity and Diversity Metrics for Generative Modelscited by 434
  12. 2018Assessing Generative Models via Precision and Recallcited by 406
14 more
  1. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
  2. 2022The Role of ImageNet Classes in Fr'echet Inception Distancecited by 213
  3. 2021Projected GANs Converge Fastercited by 208
  4. 2017An introduction to Topological Data Analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientistscited by 172
  5. 2013Stochastic Convergence of Persistence Landscapes and Silhouettescited by 43
  6. 2016Optimality of the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemmacited by 42
  7. 2022StudioGAN: A Taxonomy and Benchmark of GANs for Image Synthesiscited by 38
  8. 2022Rarity Score : A New Metric to Evaluate the Uncommonness of Synthesized Imagescited by 35
  9. 2021Manifold Topology Divergence: a Framework for Comparing Data Manifoldscited by 31
  10. 2014Robust Topological Inference: Distance To a Measure and Kernel Distancecited by 26
  11. 2013Confidence sets for persistence diagramscited by 17
  12. 2014The Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma is optimal for linear dimensionality reductioncited by 12
  13. 2021GeomCA: Geometric Evaluation of Data Representationscited by 9
  14. 2013On the Bootstrap for Persistence Diagrams and Landscapescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: