mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adversarial Constrained Bidding via Minimax Regret Optimization with Causality-Aware Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2306.07106 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.GTcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The proliferation of the Internet has led to the emergence of online advertising, driven by the mechanics of online auctions. In these repeated auctions, software agents participate on behalf of aggregated advertisers to optimize for their long-term utility. To fulfill the diverse demands, bidding strategies are employed to optimize advertising objectives subject to different spending constraints. Existing approaches on constrained bidding typically rely on i.i.d. train and test conditions, which contradicts the adversarial nature of online ad markets where different parties possess potentially conflicting objectives. In this regard, we explore the problem of constrained bidding in adversarial bidding environments, which assumes no knowledge about the adversarial factors. Instead of relying on the i.i.d. assumption, our insight is to align the train distribution of environments with the potential test distribution meanwhile minimizing policy regret. Based on this insight, we propose a practical Minimax Regret Optimization (MiRO) approach that interleaves between a teacher finding adversarial environments for tutoring and a learner meta-learning its policy over the given distribution of environments. In addition, we pioneer to incorporate expert demonstrations for learning bidding strategies. Through a causality-aware policy design, we improve upon MiRO by distilling knowledge from the experts. Extensive experiments on both industrial data and synthetic data show that our method, MiRO with Causality-aware reinforcement Learning (MiROCL), outperforms prior methods by over 30%.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.

Builds on

25 of 49 references.

References · 25

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,240
  4. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
  5. 2018The Mechanics of n-Player Differentiable Gamescited by 118
  6. 2017Real-Time Bidding by Reinforcement Learning in Display Advertisingcited by 91
  7. 2020Error Bounds of Imitating Policies and Environmentscited by 90
  8. 2019Distributionally Robust Optimization and Generalization in Kernel Methodscited by 73
  9. 2018Banach Wasserstein GANcited by 56
  10. 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning amidst Lifelong Non-Stationaritycited by 43
  11. 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
  12. 2019Bid Optimization by Multivariable Control in Display Advertisingcited by 37
13 more
  1. 2017Learning to Bid Without Knowing your Valuecited by 34
  2. 2020Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price Auctionscited by 33
  3. 2020Auction learning as a two-player gamecited by 29
  4. 2019Online Allocation and Pricing: Constant Regret via Bellman Inequalitiescited by 16
  5. 2020Learning in repeated auctionscited by 15
  6. 2020Exploration in Online Advertising Systems with Deep Uncertainty-Aware Learningcited by 12
  7. 2022ROI-Constrained Bidding via Curriculum-Guided Bayesian Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  8. 2020Learning Context-aware Task Reasoning for Efficient Meta-reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  9. 2015Optimal Real-Time Bidding Strategiescited by 8
  10. 2019Adversarial learning for revenue-maximizing auctionscited by 4
  11. 2020Reserve Price Optimization for First Price Auctionscited by 4
  12. 2016Mechanism Design for Value Maximizerscited by 3
  13. 2019Reserve Pricing in Repeated Second-Price Auctions with Strategic Bidderscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 5.

7 papers.