mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generating Language Corrections for Teaching Physical Control Tasks

arXiv 2306.07012 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2023cs.AI cs.CL cs.HCcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

AI assistance continues to help advance applications in education, from language learning to intelligent tutoring systems, yet current methods for providing students feedback are still quite limited. Most automatic feedback systems either provide binary correctness feedback, which may not help a student understand how to improve, or require hand-coding feedback templates, which may not generalize to new domains. This can be particularly challenging for physical control tasks, where the rich diversity in student behavior and specialized domains make it challenging to leverage general-purpose assistive tools for providing feedback. We design and build CORGI, a model trained to generate language corrections for physical control tasks, such as learning to ride a bike. CORGI takes in as input a pair of student and expert trajectories, and then generates natural language corrections to help the student improve. We collect and train CORGI over data from three diverse physical control tasks (drawing, steering, and joint movement). Through both automatic and human evaluations, we show that CORGI can (i) generate valid feedback for novel student trajectories, (ii) outperform baselines on domains with novel control dynamics, and (iii) improve student learning in an interactive drawing task.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
  3. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
  4. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  5. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
  6. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 661
  7. 2022MotionCLIP: Exposing Human Motion Generation to CLIP Spacecited by 408
  8. 2022X-CLIP: End-to-End Multi-grained Contrastive Learning for Video-Text Retrievalcited by 280
  9. 2021BABEL: Bodies, Action and Behavior with English Labelscited by 265
  10. 2020Language Conditioned Imitation Learning over Unstructured Datacited by 209
  11. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159
  12. 2022Correcting Robot Plans with Natural Language Feedbackcited by 69
11 more
  1. 2023"No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomycited by 60
  2. 2022Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural Languagecited by 54
  3. 2021Leveraging Language to Learn Program Abstractions and Search Heuristicscited by 45
  4. 2022Abstract Visual Reasoning with Tangram Shapescited by 43
  5. 2021LILA: Language-Informed Latent Actionscited by 27
  6. 2022Eliciting Compatible Demonstrations for Multi-Human Imitation Learningcited by 23
  7. 2022Assistive Teaching of Motor Control Tasks to Humanscited by 8
  8. 2022FaD-VLP: Fashion Vision-and-Language Pre-training towards Unified Retrieval and Captioningcited by 7
  9. 2023COACH: Cooperative Robot Teachingcited by 7
  10. 2022Giving Feedback on Interactive Student Programs with Meta-Explorationcited by 6
  11. 2020Show or Tell? Demonstration is More Robust to Changes in Shared Perception than Explanationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.