mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RankFormer: Listwise Learning-to-Rank Using Listwide Labels

arXiv 2306.05808 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2023cs.IR cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Web applications where users are presented with a limited selection of items have long employed ranking models to put the most relevant results first. Any feedback received from users is typically assumed to reflect a relative judgement on the utility of items, e.g. a user clicking on an item only implies it is better than items not clicked in the same ranked list. Hence, the objectives optimized in Learning-to-Rank (LTR) tend to be pairwise or listwise. Yet, by only viewing feedback as relative, we neglect the user's absolute feedback on the list's overall quality, e.g. when no items in the selection are clicked. We thus reconsider the standard LTR paradigm and argue the benefits of learning from this listwide signal. To this end, we propose the RankFormer as an architecture that, with a Transformer at its core, can jointly optimize a novel listwide assessment objective and a traditional listwise LTR objective. We simulate implicit feedback on public datasets and observe that the RankFormer succeeds in benefitting from listwide signals. Additionally, we conduct experiments in e-commerce on Amazon Search data and find the RankFormer to be superior to all baselines offline. An online experiment shows that knowledge distillation can be used to find immediate practical use for the RankFormer.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2023.

Builds on

16 of 44 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  3. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,603
  4. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 199
  5. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  6. 2013Introducing LETOR 4.0 Datasetscited by 121
  7. 2019A Deep Look into Neural Ranking Models for Information Retrievalcited by 79
  8. 2022Formal Algorithms for Transformerscited by 72
  9. 2018Learning a Deep Listwise Context Model for Ranking Refinementcited by 62
  10. 2018Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimationcited by 61
  11. 2019SetRank: Learning a Permutation-Invariant Ranking Model for Information Retrievalcited by 48
  12. 2019On Application of Learning to Rank for E-Commerce Searchcited by 24
4 more
  1. 2018Learning Groupwise Multivariate Scoring Functions Using Deep Neural Networkscited by 22
  2. 2020Context-Aware Learning to Rank with Self-Attentioncited by 22
  3. 2019To Model or to Intervene: A Comparison of Counterfactual and Online Learning to Rank from User Interactionscited by 13
  4. 2022PEAR: Personalized Re-ranking with Contextualized Transformer for Recommendationcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026RLPO: Residual Listwise Preference Optimization for Long-Context Review Ranking
  2. 2025RewardRank: Optimizing True Learning-to-Rank Utility
  3. 2025Theoretical Guarantees for LT-TTD: A Unified Transformer-based Architecture for Two-Level Ranking Systems
  4. 2026ZooWork-ShopRanker: An Open, Preference-Aligned E-Commerce Reranker
  5. 2025RankArena: A Unified Platform for Evaluating Retrieval, Reranking and RAG with Human and LLM Feedback
  6. 2025Hierarchical Group-wise Ranking Framework for Recommendation Models
  7. 2025ListConRanker: A Contrastive Text Reranker with Listwise Encoding
  8. 2025Rank-K: Test-Time Reasoning for Listwise Reranking