mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Group-wise Ranking Framework for Recommendation Models

arXiv 2506.12756 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2025cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In modern recommender systems, CTR/CVR models are increasingly trained with ranking objectives to improve item ranking quality. While this shift aligns training more closely with serving goals, most existing methods rely on in-batch negative sampling, which predominantly surfaces easy negatives. This limits the model's ability to capture fine-grained user preferences and weakens overall ranking performance. To address this, we propose a Hierarchical Group-wise Ranking Framework with two key components. First, we apply residual vector quantization to user embeddings to generate hierarchical user codes that partition users into hierarchical, trie-structured clusters. Second, we apply listwise ranking losses to user-item pairs at each level of the hierarchy, where shallow levels group loosely similar users and deeper levels group highly similar users, reinforcing learning-to-rank signals through progressively harder negatives. Since users with similar preferences and content exposure tend to yield more informative negatives, applying ranking losses within these hierarchical user groups serves as an effective approximation of hard negative mining. Our approach improves ranking performance without requiring complex real-time context collection or retrieval infrastructure. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework consistently enhances both model calibration and ranking accuracy, offering a scalable and practical solution for industrial recommender systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.

Builds on

10 of 18 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Neural Discrete Representation Learningcited by 4,712
  2. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  3. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  4. 2021SoundStream: An End-to-End Neural Audio Codeccited by 771
  5. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 328
  6. 2022Joint Optimization of Ranking and Calibration with Contextualized Hybrid Modelcited by 22
  7. 2022Regression Compatible Listwise Objectives for Calibrated Ranking with Binary Relevancecited by 10
  8. 2025Real-time Indexing for Large-scale Recommendation by Streaming Vector Quantization Retrievercited by 9
  9. 2024Understanding the Ranking Loss for Recommendation with Sparse User Feedbackcited by 8
  10. 2024A Self-boosted Framework for Calibrated Rankingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Hard Negative Sampling via Large Language Models for Recommendation
  2. 2025On Negative-aware Preference Optimization for Recommendation
  3. 2024Enhancing Retrieval Performance: An Ensemble Approach For Hard Negative Mining
  4. 2026Towards Reliable Negative Sampling for Recommendation with Implicit Feedback via In-Community Popularity
  5. 2025Learning to Fast Unrank in Collaborative Filtering Recommendation
  6. 2023Embedding in Recommender Systems: A Survey
  7. 2026Pathwise Alignment for Collaborative Filtering: Bilateral Conditional Flow Regularization ↗
  8. 2023RankFormer: Listwise Learning-to-Rank Using Listwide Labels