mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ZooWork-ShopRanker: An Open, Preference-Aligned E-Commerce Reranker

arXiv 2609.31002 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Open rerankers trained for general web retrieval transfer imperfectly to e-commerce, where ranking decisions depend not only on topical relevance but also on user preferences, product constraints, and comparative product fit. These preference signals are difficult to supervise at scale: real search traffic provides authentic queries and candidates but no clean pairwise labels. We present ZooWork-ShopRanker, a family of e-commerce rerankers (0.6B, 4B, and 8B) aligned to judge-labeled shopping preference. Training pairs are labeled by a panel of reasoning large language models (LLMs) from different families acting as a preference oracle, with position-debiased judgments and agreement tiers, and the rerankers are trained on these labels. The aligned 8B flagship then serves as a distillation teacher for the efficient 4B and 0.6B models, which are fit to its scores and sharpened on judged pairs. To measure progress, we introduce ShopRank-Bench, a contamination-limited benchmark of ~10,000 private-traffic preference pairs in both text formats, tiered by how many judge families committed to each label. ZooWork-ShopRanker-8B and -4B significantly outperform the strongest open reranker baseline, every model significantly beats its own un-aligned base, and ZooWork-ShopRanker-0.6B beats its size peer; the gains hold in both formats and extend to common MTEB benchmarks. We release the models and the dual-format ShopRank-Bench to facilitate further research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Preference alignment for recommenders and RAG, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 20 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 27 references.

References · 20

  1. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  2. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  3. 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
  4. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
  5. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  6. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
  7. 2024M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillationcited by 1,073
  8. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 963
  9. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 640
  10. 2020SPECTER: Document-level Representation Learning using Citation-informed Transformerscited by 430
  11. 2024jina-embeddings-v3: Multilingual Embeddings With Task LoRAcited by 141
  12. 2022Shopping Queries Dataset: A Large-Scale ESCI Benchmark for Improving Product Searchcited by 65
8 more
  1. 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 55
  2. 2015Semi-supervised Question Retrieval with Gated Convolutionscited by 28
  3. 2024FAMMA: A Benchmark for Financial Domain Multilingual Multimodal Question Answeringcited by 20
  4. 2023Instruction Distillation Makes Large Language Models Efficient Zero-shot Rankerscited by 19
  5. 2026QuitoBench: A High-Quality Open Time Series Forecasting Benchmarkcited by 10
  6. 2025LLM Alignment as Retriever Optimization: An Information Retrieval Perspectivecited by 7
  7. 2026LookBench: A Live and Holistic Open Benchmark for Fashion Image Retrievalcited by 7
  8. 2026ZooClaw-FashionSigLIP2: Distilled Fine-tuning for Robust Fashion Retrievalcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Semantic Retrieval for Product Search in E-Commerce
  2. 2026MemRerank: Preference Memory for Personalized Product Reranking
  3. 2025Automated Query-Product Relevance Labeling using Large Language Models for E-commerce Search
  4. 2026Relevance Matters: A Multi-Task and Multi-Stage Large Language Model Approach for E-commerce Query Rewriting ↗
  5. 2026Synthetic Data Powers Product Retrieval for Long-tail Knowledge-Intensive Queries in E-commerce Search
  6. 2026QueryAgent-R1: Bridging Query Generation and Product Retrieval for E-Commerce Query Recommendation
  7. 2026EAGER: Enrich-and-Align Generative Query Recommendation from Clicked Items in E-commerce Search ↗
  8. 2026Shopping Companion: Benchmarking and Training LLM Agents for Long-Horizon Preference-Grounded E-Commerce Tasks